Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34273989›Full record

ArticleHuman resources for health2021

Regional inequalities and substitutability of health resources in the Czech Republic: a five methods of evaluation.

Martin Dlouhý

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human resources for health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Martin DlouhýFaculty of Informatics and Statistics, Prague University of Economics and Business, 4 Winston Churchill Sq., 13067, Prague 3, Czech Republic. dlouhy@vse.cz.ORCID 0000-0003-1028-1822

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn analysis of the regional distribution of health resources is one of the tools for evaluating equal geographic access to health care. The usual analytical approach to an assessment of regional differences is to evaluate each health resource separately. This is a sensible approach, because there may be systematic reasons for any differences, for example, higher salaries in urban areas. However, a separate evaluation of the regional distribution of health resource capacities may be misleading. We should evaluate all health resource capacities as a whole and consider the substitutability of resources.

objectiveThis study aims to measure regional inequalities in the Czech Republic with the help of alternative approaches to the evaluation of regional inequalities in the case of several substitutable health resources.

methodsFive alternative evaluation methods (models) are described and applied: the separate evaluation, expert model, market model, common weights model, and production frontier model.

resultsThe regional distribution of physicians and nurses in the Czech Republic in 2017 was evaluated. In spite of many regulations at the national and regional levels, we have found inequalities in regional resource distribution. The models that consider all health resources and the possibility of a resource substitution show lower inequalities between regional health resource capacities.

conclusionBoth researchers and policy-makers should always consider the possibility of resource substitutions in the assessment of regional inequalities.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth ResourcesCzech RepublicHumansCommon weights modelCzech RepublicData envelopment analysisInequality measuresProduction frontier modelRegional inequality

Identifiers

PMID34273989
PMCPMC8285727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.