ArticleThrombosis journal2021
Lead thrombus under standard-dose edoxaban in a patient with normal to high creatinine clearance and protein S deficiency.
Article in Thrombosis journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with venous thrombosis and inherited thrombophilia.International journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants After Mechanical Thrombectomy in Venous Thromboembolism: A Comparative Study of 55 Patients.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Impact of baseline renal function on the efficacy and safety of different Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Patients - A cohort study.Thrombosis journal · 2022Article
- Inherited Thrombophilia in the Era of Direct Oral Anticoagulants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- A thrombophilia family with protein S deficiency due to protein translation disorders caused by a Leu607Ser heterozygous mutation in PROS1.Thrombosis journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are as effective and safe as warfarin for thromboembolic prevention and treatment. The efficacy of NOACs lacks evidence from large and randomized studies in patients with inherited severe thrombophilia, including protein S deficiency. Further, some concerns still exist regarding the relative efficacy of edoxaban in preventing arterial thromboembolism in patients with normal to high creatinine clearance (CrCl). We present a case of a rare complication of lead thrombus under standard-dose edoxaban in a patient with protein S deficiency and supernormal renal function. CASE PRESENTATION: A 65-year-old man experienced persistent chest tightness and a high level of D-dimer. Chest computed tomography (CT) showed a lead thrombus at the superior vena cava. He had a medical history including, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAf), sick sinus syndrome after permanent pacemaker implantation, and transient ischemic attack. He received standard-dose edoxaban (60 mg daily) after PAf was diagnosed. His estimated CrCl was 98.6-102.1 mL/min. However, protein S deficiency (22.8%; normal range: 55-130%) was diagnosed. After switching to dabigatran (150 mg twice daily) for 3 months, the chest CT showed lead thrombus resolution and no symptoms were seen during the follow-up period.
conclusionsThis case was a rare complication of lead thrombus in a protein S deficient patient with normal renal function receiving standard-dose edoxaban. Edoxaban efficacy is uncertain in patients with protein S deficiency, and intracardiac devices also increase the risk of thromboembolic events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.