Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34273949›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2021

ARPEGGIO: Automated Reproducible Polyploid EpiGenetic GuIdance workflOw.

Stefan Milosavljevic, Tony Kuo, Samuele Decarli, Lucas Mohn, Jun Sese, Kentaro K Shimizu, Rie Shimizu-Inatsugi, Mark D Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stefan MilosavljevicDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Tony KuoCentre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada.
Samuele DecarliDepartment of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Lucas MohnDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jun SeseAIST Artificial Intelligence Research Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Kentaro K ShimizuDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Rie Shimizu-InatsugiDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Mark D RobinsonSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. mark.robinson@mls.uzh.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3048-5518

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhole genome duplication (WGD) events are common in the evolutionary history of many living organisms. For decades, researchers have been trying to understand the genetic and epigenetic impact of WGD and its underlying molecular mechanisms. Particular attention was given to allopolyploid study systems, species resulting from an hybridization event accompanied by WGD. Investigating the mechanisms behind the survival of a newly formed allopolyploid highlighted the key role of DNA methylation. With the improvement of high-throughput methods, such as whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS), an opportunity opened to further understand the role of DNA methylation at a larger scale and higher resolution. However, only a few studies have applied WGBS to allopolyploids, which might be due to lack of genomic resources combined with a burdensome data analysis process. To overcome these problems, we developed the Automated Reproducible Polyploid EpiGenetic GuIdance workflOw (ARPEGGIO): the first workflow for the analysis of epigenetic data in polyploids. This workflow analyzes WGBS data from allopolyploid species via the genome assemblies of the allopolyploid's parent species. ARPEGGIO utilizes an updated read classification algorithm (EAGLE-RC), to tackle the challenge of sequence similarity amongst parental genomes. ARPEGGIO offers automation, but more importantly, a complete set of analyses including spot checks starting from raw WGBS data: quality checks, trimming, alignment, methylation extraction, statistical analyses and downstream analyses. A full run of ARPEGGIO outputs a list of genes showing differential methylation. ARPEGGIO was made simple to set up, run and interpret, and its implementation ensures reproducibility by including both package management and containerization.

resultsWe evaluated ARPEGGIO in two ways. First, we tested EAGLE-RC's performance with publicly available datasets given a ground truth, and we show that EAGLE-RC decreases the error rate by 3 to 4 times compared to standard approaches. Second, using the same initial dataset, we show agreement between ARPEGGIO's output and published results. Compared to other similar workflows, ARPEGGIO is the only one supporting polyploid data.

conclusionsThe goal of ARPEGGIO is to promote, support and improve polyploid research with a reproducible and automated set of analyses in a convenient implementation. ARPEGGIO is available at https://github.com/supermaxiste/ARPEGGIO .

Indexed as

DNA MethylationSoftwareEpigenesis, GeneticHumansPolyploidyReproducibility of ResultsWorkflowAllopolyploidsAutomationBisulfite-sequencingDna-methylationEpigeneticsPolyploidyReproducibilitySnakemakeWhole-genome-bisulfite-sequencingWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID34273949
PMCPMC8285871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.