Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34273940›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Introducing an efficient sampling method for national surveys with limited sample sizes: application to a national study to determine quality and cost of healthcare.

Mahboubeh Parsaeian, Mahdi Mahdavi, Mojdeh Saadati, Parinaz Mehdipour, Ali Sheidaei, Shahab Khatibzadeh, Farshad Farzadfar, Saeid Shahraz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Effects of Genetic Relatedness of Kin Pairs on Univariate ACE Model Performance.Twin research and human genetics : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Mahboubeh ParsaeianDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. mahbobehparsaeian@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1928-5424
Mahdi MahdaviNational Institute of Health Research (NIHR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mojdeh SaadatiDepartment of Computer Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50010, USA.
Parinaz MehdipourNon-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ali SheidaeiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Shahab KhatibzadehHeller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA.
Farshad FarzadfarNon-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Saeid ShahrazInstitute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRBrandeis University · USHarvard University · USIowa State University · USTufts Medical Center · US

Funding

IR Iran National Institute for Medical Research Development NIMAD 942936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSampling a small number of participants from an entire country is not straightforward. In this case, researchers reluctantly sample from a single setting or few settings, which limits the generalizability of findings. Therefore, there is a need to design efficient sampling method for small sample size surveys that can produce generalizable results at the country level.

methodsData comprised of twenty proxy variables to measure health services demands, structures, and outcomes of 413 districts of Iran. We used two data mining methods (hierarchical clustering method (HCM) and model-based clustering method (MCM)) to create homogenous groups of districts, i.e., strata based on these variables. We compared the internal and stability validity of the methods by statistical indices. An expert group checked the face validity of the methods, particularly regarding the total number of strata and the combination of districts in each stratum. The efficiency of selected method, which is measured by the inverse of variance, was compared with a simple random sampling (SRS) through simulation. The sampling design was tested in a national study in Iran, which aimed to evaluate the quality and costs of medical care for eight selected diseases by only recruiting 300 participants per disease at the country level.

resultsMCM and HCM divided the districts into eight and two clusters, respectively. The measures of internal and stability validity showed that clusters created by MCM were more separated, compact, and stable, thus forming our optimum strata. The probability of death from stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and in-hospital mortality rate were the most important indicators that distinguished the eight strata. Based on the simulation results, MCM increased the efficiency of the sampling design up to 1.7 times compared to SRS.

conclusionsThe use of data mining improved the efficiency of sampling up to 1.7 times greater than SRS and markedly reduced the number of strata to eight in the entire country. The proposed sampling design also identified key variables that could be used to classify districts in Iran for sampling from these target populations in the future studies.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareCluster AnalysisHumansIranReproducibility of ResultsSample SizeIran quality of Care in Medicine Program (IQCAMP)Model-based clusteringSampling efficiencySmall sample sizeSurvey sampling methodValidity

Identifiers

PMID34273940
PMCPMC8285867
OpenAlexW3111524271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.