Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34273935›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2022

Integration or Fragmentation of Health Care? Examining Policies and Politics in a Belgian Case Study.

Monika Martens, Katrien Danhieux, Sara Van Belle, Edwin Wouters, Wim Van Damme, Roy Remmen, Sibyl Anthierens, Josefien Van Olmen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Monika MartensDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1432-0684
Katrien DanhieuxDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6064-5335
Sara Van BelleDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2074-0359
Edwin WoutersCentre for Population, Family & Health, Department of Social Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2268-3829
Wim Van DammeDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6344-3007
Roy RemmenDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6509-9561
Sibyl AnthierensDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4762-1907
Josefien Van OlmenDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9724-1887

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobally, health systems have been struggling to cope with the increasing burden of chronic diseases and respond to associated patient needs. Integrated care (IC) for chronic diseases offers solutions, but implementing these new models requires multi-stakeholder action and integrated policies to address social, organisational, and financial barriers. Policy implementation for IC has been little studied, especially through a political lens. This paper examines how IC policies in Belgium were developed over the last decade and how stakeholders have played a role in these policies.

methodsWe used a case study design. After an exploratory document review, we selected three IC policies. We then interviewed 25 key stakeholders in the field of IC. The stakeholder analysis entailed a detailed mapping of the stakeholders' power, position, and interest related to the three selected policies. Interview participants included policy-makers, civil servants (from ministry of health and health insurance), representatives of health professionals' associations, academics, and patient organisations. Additionally, a processual analysis of IC policy processes (2007-2020) through literature review was used to frame the interviews by means of a chronic care policy timeline.

resultsIn Belgium, a variety of policy initiatives have been developed in recent years both at central and decentralised levels. The power analysis and policy position maps exposed tensions between federal and federated governments in terms of overlapping competence, as well as the implications of the power shift from federal to federated levels as a consequence of the 2014 state reform.

conclusionThe 2014 partial decentralisation of healthcare has created fragmentation of decisive power which undermines efforts towards IC. This political trend towards fragmentation is at odds with the need for IC. Further research is needed on how public health policy competences and reform durability of IC policies will evolve.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth PolicyBelgiumHumansPoliticsPublic PolicyChronic CareIntegrated CarePolicyProcessual AnalysisQualitative ResearchStakeholder Analysis

Identifiers

PMID34273935
PMCPMC9808233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.