Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34273788›Full record

ReviewSexual medicine2021

The Use of Penile Traction Devices for Peyronie's Disease: Position Statements from the European Society for Sexual Medicine.

Borja García-Gómez, Antonio Aversa, Manuel Alonso-Isa, Arie Parnham, Ege Can Serefoglu, Giovanni Corona, Carlo Bettocchi, Yacov Reisman, Marta Skrodzka, Javier Romero-Otero

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sexual medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Non-surgical therapies for Peyronie's disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Borja García-GómezDepartamento de Urología, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, HM Hospitales. Universidad San Pablo-CEU, Madrid, Spain; Departamento de Urología, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
Antonio AversaDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine; University of Catanzaro Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Manuel Alonso-IsaDepartamento de Urología, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
Arie ParnhamThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, the University of Manchester, Manchester.
Ege Can SerefogluBiruni University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Giovanni CoronaEndocrinology Unit, Medical Department, Azienda Usl, Maggiore-Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Carlo BettocchiDepartment of Urology, University of Bari, Bari, Apulia, Italy.
Yacov ReismanDepartment of Urology, Amstelland Hospital, Amstelveen, The Netherlands.
Marta SkrodzkaDepartment of Urology, St. George's University Hospital, London, UK.
Javier Romero-OteroDepartamento de Urología, Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe, HM Hospitales. Universidad San Pablo-CEU, Madrid, Spain; Departamento de Urología, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: jromerootero@hotmail.com.
Universidad San Pablo CEU · ESBiruni University · TRHewlett-Packard (Netherlands) · NLMagna Graecia University · ITMedica (Italy) · ITOncology Group of Southern Italy · ITResearch Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ESUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPenile traction therapy (PTT) aims to non-surgically reduce curvature, enhance girth, and recover lost length. Available clinical practice guidelines however lack clear recommendations regarding their use.

aimTo present a comprehensive review and recommendation regarding the available evidence to the use of PTT in Peyronie's disease (PD).

methodsA systematic literature search was performed on Pubmed and Medline for relevant studies from all times until 2019. Studies of PTT (monotherapy and in combination) in patients with PD with any documented degree of curvature and in either the acute or chronic phase of the disease were included. Full texts not published in English language were excluded. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Several scenarios, including preclinical data have been investigated. For each topic covered evidence was analyzed and expert opinion was stated.

resultsThe paucity of high-level studies precluded any strong recommendations, however, specific statements on this topic, summarizing the ESSM position, were provided. The available data about the use of PTT in PD are still poor, and the impact of this therapy for the treatment of PD has not been clearly stablished. Available data in the clinical setting are still poor, and the impact of these devices on PD evolution has not been clearly established.

conclusionPTT seems to be a valid treatment option for PD, although there is not enough evidence to give any definitive recommendation in any clinical scenario. García-Gómez B, Aversa A, Alonso-Isa M et al. The Use of Penile Traction Devices for Peyronie's Disease: Position Statements from the European Society for Sexual Medicine. Sex Med 2021;9:100387.

Indexed as

Conservative treatmentPenile tractionPeyronie's diseaseTraction therapy

Identifiers

PMID34273788
PMCPMC8360933
OpenAlexW3184500290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.