Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34273770›Full record

ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2021

Identification of potential plant bioactive as SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein and human ACE2 fusion inhibitors.

Rahul Singh, Vijay Kumar Bhardwaj, Jatin Sharma, Dinesh Kumar, Rituraj Purohit

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Identification ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Journal of traditional and complementary medicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Future science OA · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rahul SinghStructural Bioinformatics Lab, CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology (CSIR-IHBT), Palampur, HP, 176061, India; Biotechnology Division, CSIR-IHBT, Palampur, HP, 176061, India.
Vijay Kumar BhardwajStructural Bioinformatics Lab, CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology (CSIR-IHBT), Palampur, HP, 176061, India; Biotechnology Division, CSIR-IHBT, Palampur, HP, 176061, India; Academy of Scientific & Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, 201002, India.
Jatin SharmaStructural Bioinformatics Lab, CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology (CSIR-IHBT), Palampur, HP, 176061, India; Biotechnology Division, CSIR-IHBT, Palampur, HP, 176061, India.
Dinesh KumarChemical Technology Division, CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology, Post Box No. 6, Palampur, 176061, Himachal Pradesh, India; Academy of Scientific & Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, 201002, India.
Rituraj PurohitStructural Bioinformatics Lab, CSIR-Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology (CSIR-IHBT), Palampur, HP, 176061, India; Biotechnology Division, CSIR-IHBT, Palampur, HP, 176061, India; Academy of Scientific & Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, 201002, India. Electronic address: rituraj@ihbt.res.in.
Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Spike receptor binding domain (S-RBD) from SARS-CoV-2, a crucial protein for the entrance of the virus into target cells is known to cause infection by binding to a cell surface protein. Hence, reckoning therapeutics for the S-RBD of SARS-CoV-2 may address a significant way to target viral entry into the host cells. Herein, through in-silico approaches (Molecular docking, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and end-state thermodynamics), we aimed to screen natural molecules from different plants for their ability to inhibit S-RBD of SARS-CoV-2. We prioritized the best interacting molecules (Diacetylcurcumin and Dicaffeoylquinic acid) by analysis of protein-ligand interactions and subjected them for long-term MD simulations. We found that Dicaffeoylquinic acid interacted prominently with essential residues (Lys417, Gln493, Tyr489, Phe456, Tyr473, and Glu484) of S-RBD. These residues are involved in interactions between S-RBD and ACE2 and could inhibit the viral entry into the host cells. The in-silico analyses indicated that Dicaffeoylquinic acid and Diacetylcurcumin might have the potential to act as inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD. The present study warrants further in-vitro and in-vivo studies of Dicaffeoylquinic acid and Diacetylcurcumin for validation and acceptance of their inhibitory potential against S-RBD of SARS-CoV-2.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsCOVID-19Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2HumansMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationPhytochemicalsProtein BindingSARS-CoV-2ACE2 protein, humanAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Antiviral AgentsPhytochemicalsSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2ACE2Dicaffeoylquinic acidEnsemble clusteringMM-PBSAS-RBD

Identifiers

PMID34273770
PMCPMC8264305
OpenAlexW3179950639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.