Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34273510›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases2021

Long-term clinical follow-up of patients suffering from moderate-to-severe COVID-19 infection: a monocentric prospective observational cohort study.

Gilles Darcis, Antoine Bouquegneau, Nathalie Maes, Marie Thys, Monique Henket, Florence Labye, Anne-Françoise Rousseau, Perrine Canivet, Colin Desir, Doriane Calmes and 7 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Global prevalence of post-COVID-19 condition: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective evidence.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Prevalence, risk factors and treatments for post-COVID-19 breathlessness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Long-Term Consequences of COVID-19 at 6 Months and Above: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  8. Prevalence of post-acute COVID-19 syndrome symptoms at different follow-up periods: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Pooled it
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Long COVID syndrome: An unfolding enigma.The Indian journal of medical research · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Gilles DarcisDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium. Electronic address: gdarcis@chuliege.be.
Antoine BouquegneauDepartment of Nephrology-Dialysis-Transplantation, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Nathalie MaesDepartment of Biostatistics and Medico-Economic Information, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Marie ThysDepartment of Biostatistics and Medico-Economic Information, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Monique HenketDepartment of Pneumology, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Florence LabyeDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Anne-Françoise RousseauDepartment of Intensive Care, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Perrine CanivetDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Colin DesirDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Doriane CalmesDepartment of Pneumology, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Raphael SchilsDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Sophie De WormDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Philippe LéonardDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Paul MeunierDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Michel MoutschenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Renaud LouisDepartment of Pneumology, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Julien GuiotDepartment of Pneumology, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesVarious symptoms and considerable organ dysfunction persist following infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Uncertainty remains about the potential mid- and long-term health sequelae. This prospective study of patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Liège University Hospital, Belgium aimed to determine the persistent consequences of COVID-19.

methodsPatients admitted to the University Hospital of Liège with moderate-to-severe confirmed COVID-19, discharged between 2 March and 1 October 2020, were recruited prospectively. Follow-up at 3 and 6 months after hospital discharge included demographic and clinical data, biological data, pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and high-resolution computed tomography (CT) scans of the chest.

resultsIn total, 199 individuals were included in the analysis. Most patients received oxygen supplementation (80.4%). Six months after discharge, 47% and 32% of patients still had exertional dyspnoea and fatigue. PFTs at 3-month follow-up revealed a reduced diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide (mean 71.6 ± 18.6%), and this increased significantly at 6-month follow-up (P<0.0001). Chest CT scans showed a high prevalence (68.9% of the cohort) of persistent abnormalities, mainly ground glass opacities. Duration of hospitalization, intensive care unit admission and mechanical ventilation were not associated with the persistence of symptoms 3 months after discharge.

conclusionThe prevalence of persistent symptoms following hospitalization with COVID-19 is high and stable for up to 6 months after discharge. However, biological, functional and iconographic abnormalities improved significantly over time.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cohort StudiesFollow-Up StudiesHumansProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2COVID-19long COVIDpost-acute COVID-19post-COVIDsequelae

Identifiers

PMID34273510
PMCPMC8278829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.