Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34273053›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2021

Multitask machine learning models for predicting lipophilicity (logP) in the SAMPL7 challenge.

Eelke B Lenselink, Pieter F W Stouten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Predictive Machine Learning Models for Olfaction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  6. Chemprop: A Machine Learning Package for Chemical Property Prediction.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Evaluation of log P, pKJournal of computer-aided molecular design · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eelke B LenselinkGalapagos NV, Generaal De Wittelaan L11 A3, 2800, Mechelen, Belgium. bart.lenselink@glpg.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5459-2978
Pieter F W StoutenGalapagos NV, Generaal De Wittelaan L11 A3, 2800, Mechelen, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5203-2202

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of lipophilicity-logP-based on molecular structures is a well-established field. Predictions of logP are often used to drive forward drug discovery projects. Driven by the SAMPL7 challenge, in this manuscript we describe the steps that were taken to construct a novel machine learning model that can predict and generalize well. This model is based on the recently described Directed-Message Passing Neural Networks (D-MPNNs). Further enhancements included: both the inclusion of additional datasets from ChEMBL (RMSE improvement of 0.03), and the addition of helper tasks (RMSE improvement of 0.04). To the best of our knowledge, the concept of adding predictions from other models (Simulations Plus logP and logD@pH7.4, respectively) as helper tasks is novel and could be applied in a broader context. The final model that we constructed and used to participate in the challenge ranked 2/17 ranked submissions with an RMSE of 0.66, and an MAE of 0.48 (submission: Chemprop). On other datasets the model also works well, especially retrospectively applied to the SAMPL6 challenge where it would have ranked number one out of all submissions (RMSE of 0.35). Despite the fact that our model works well, we conclude with suggestions that are expected to improve the model even further.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryMachine LearningModels, ChemicalModels, StatisticalNeural Networks, ComputerQuantum TheorySolubilitySolventsThermodynamicsSolventsD-MPNNlogP predictionMultitask machine learningSAMPL7

Identifiers

PMID34273053
PMCPMC8367913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.