Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34273049›Full record

ArticleGeroScience2021

Therapeutic prevention of COVID-19 in elderly: a case-control study.

Frederic Blanc, Cedric Waechter, Thomas Vogel, Benoit Schorr, Catherine Demuynck, Catherine Martin Hunyadi, Maxence Meyer, Denata Mutelica, Nadjiba Bougaa, Samira Fafi-Kremer and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeroScience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Caring for older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Review
  8. Role of senescence in the chronic health consequences of COVID-19.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Frederic BlancICube Laboratory, UMR 7357 and CNRS, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. f.blanc@unistra.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6714-3247
Cedric WaechterPôle de Gériatrie, La Robertsau Geriatric Hospital, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Thomas VogelPôle de Gériatrie, La Robertsau Geriatric Hospital, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Benoit SchorrPôle de Gériatrie, La Robertsau Geriatric Hospital, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Catherine DemuynckPôle de Gériatrie, La Robertsau Geriatric Hospital, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Catherine Martin HunyadiPôle de Gériatrie, La Robertsau Geriatric Hospital, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Maxence MeyerPôle de Gériatrie, La Robertsau Geriatric Hospital, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Denata MutelicaPôle de Gériatrie, La Robertsau Geriatric Hospital, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Nadjiba BougaaPôle de Gériatrie, La Robertsau Geriatric Hospital, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Samira Fafi-KremerVirology Department, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Lidia CalabresePôle de Gériatrie, La Robertsau Geriatric Hospital, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Elise SchmittPôle de Gériatrie, La Robertsau Geriatric Hospital, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Delphine ImperialePôle de Gériatrie, La Robertsau Geriatric Hospital, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Catherine JehlPôle de Gériatrie, La Robertsau Geriatric Hospital, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Alexandre BoussugePôle de Gériatrie, La Robertsau Geriatric Hospital, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Carmen SunaPôle de Gériatrie, La Robertsau Geriatric Hospital, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
François WeillPôle de Gériatrie, La Robertsau Geriatric Hospital, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Alexia MatzingerPôle de Gériatrie, La Robertsau Geriatric Hospital, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Candice MullerPôle de Gériatrie, La Robertsau Geriatric Hospital, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Patrick KarcherPôle de Gériatrie, La Robertsau Geriatric Hospital, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Georges KaltenbachPôle de Gériatrie, La Robertsau Geriatric Hospital, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Erik SauleauICube Laboratory, UMR 7357 and CNRS, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 is a particularly aggressive disease for the elderly as 86% of deaths related to COVID-19 occur in people over 65 years of age. Despite the urgent need for a preventive treatment, there are currently no serious leads, other than the vaccination. The aim of this retrospective case-control study is to find a pharmacological preventive treatment of COVID-19 in elderly patients. One-hundred-seventy-nine patients had been in contact with other COVID-19 patients at home or in hospital, of whom 89 had tested RT-PCR-positive (COVID-pos) for the virus and 90 had tested RT-PCR-negative (COVID-neg). Treatments within 15 days prior to RT-PCR (including antihypertensive drugs, antipsychotics, antibiotics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), oral antidiabetics (OADs), corticosteroids, immunosuppressants), comorbidities, symptoms, laboratory values, and clinical outcome were all collected. COVID-pos patients more frequently had a history of diabetes (P = .016) and alcoholism (P = .023), a lower leukocyte count (P = .014) and a higher mortality rate - 29.2% versus 14.4% - (P = .014) when compared to COVID-neg patients. Patients on PPIs were 2.3 times less likely (odds ratio [OR] = 0.4381, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.2331, 0.8175], P = .0053) to develop COVID-19 infection, compared to those not on PPIs. No other treatment decreased or increased this risk. COVID-pos patients on antipsychotics (P = .0013) and OADs (P = .0153), particularly metformin (P = .0237), were less likely to die. Thus, patients on treatment with PPI were less likely to develop COVID-19 infection, and those on antipsychotics or metformin had a lower risk of mortality. However, prospective studies, including clinical trials, are needed to confirm or not these findings.

Indexed as

COVID-19AgedCase-Control StudiesHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeAntipsychoticsCOVID-19ElderlyGeriatricsMetforminPreventionProton pump inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID34273049
PMCPMC8285285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.