Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34273037›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2021

The examination of stress shielding in a finite element lumbar spine inclusive of the thoracolumbar fascia.

Emily Newell, Mark Driscoll

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emily NewellMusculoskeletal Biomechanics Research Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, 817 Sherbrooke St. W, Montréal, QC, H3A 0C3, Canada.
Mark DriscollMusculoskeletal Biomechanics Research Lab, Department of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, 817 Sherbrooke St. W, Montréal, QC, H3A 0C3, Canada. mark.driscoll@mcgill.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5348-6054

Funding

Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Nature et Technologies FQRNT NC-205220Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada GP514085-17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the prevalence of low back pain (LBP) in society, the pathomechanism of LBP continues to elude researchers. LBP patients have demonstrated morphological and material property changes to their lumbar soft tissues, potentially leading to irregular load sharing within the lumbar spine. This study aims to analyze potential stress shielding consequential of augmented soft tissue properties via the comparison of a healthy and LBP finite element models. The models developed in this study include the vertebrae, intervertebral discs and soft tissues from L1-S1. Soft tissue morphology and material properties for the LBP model were augmented to reflect documented clinical findings. Model validation preceded testing and was confirmed through comparison to the available literature. Relative to the healthy model, the LBP model demonstrated an increase in stress by 15.6%, with 99.8% of this stress increase being distributed towards the thoracolumbar fascia. The majority of stress skewed towards the fascia may indicate a potential stress allocation bias whereby the lumbar muscles are unable to receive regular loading, leading to stress shielding. This load allocation bias and subsequent stress shielding may potentially contribute to the progression and pathomechanism of LBP but prospective studies would be required to make that link.

Indexed as

Low Back PainLumbar VertebraeBiomechanical PhenomenaFasciaFinite Element AnalysisHumansProspective StudiesBiomechanicsFinite element analysisLow back painLumbar fasciaPhysiological stress shielding

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.