ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022
Distress among cancer patients attending rehabilitation in the community.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life and Distress in an Asian Community-Based Cancer Rehabilitation Program.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study is to identify sources of distress among cancer patients attending rehabilitation in the community.
methodsParticipants were 430 patients recruited from a cancer rehabilitation center in Singapore between 2017 and 2018, who had rated their distress using the distress thermometer (DT) and indicated associated problems on the problem list. Chi-square tests were used to detect differences in the reported symptoms among three age groups. Exploratory factor analysis was used to identify symptom clusters. Partial correlational analysis was then performed to examine the relationship between distress, symptom clusters, and age controlling for gender and cancer type.
resultsAbout 30% of the participants reported distress ≥ 5 on the DT (mean 3.3 ± 2.5), and the mean number of problems endorsed was 8 ± 6. A higher total number of reported problems (r = .63) and younger age (r = - .21) were associated with increased distress. The younger age group also reported more problems surrounding emotions, finance, work/school, children-related issues, and physical symptoms such as sleep and nausea. Of the 12 factors identified, 9 psychosocial and physical symptom clusters correlated with distress (r ranging from .12 to .41). All results were statistically significant after adjustment (p ≤ 0.05).
conclusionYounger survivors are more at risk of distress and report greater role functioning concerns related to childcare, partner relationship, and work participation. Age-tailored and multimodal interventions may be necessary to adequately address age-related differences and help coordinate management of multiple symptom clusters across physical and psychosocial concerns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.