Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34273005›Full record

SynthesisJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2021

Human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16 and 18 infection and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fausto Petrelli, Gabriella De Santi, Valentina Rampulla, Antonio Ghidini, Paola Mercurio, Marco Mariani, Michele Manara, Emanuele Rausa, Veronica Lonati, Matteo Viti and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fausto PetrelliOncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy. faupe@libero.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9639-4486
Gabriella De SantiGeneral Surgery 2, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy.
Valentina RampullaGeneral Surgery 2, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy.
Antonio GhidiniOncology Unit, Casa di Cura Igea, Milano, Italy.
Paola MercurioPathology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy.
Marco MarianiGeneral Surgery 2, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy.
Michele ManaraGeneral Surgery 2, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy.
Emanuele RausaGeneral Surgery 1, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.
Veronica LonatiOncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy.
Matteo VitiGeneral Surgery 2, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy.
Andrea LucianiOncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy.
Andrea CelottiGeneral Surgery 2, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera Treviglio · ITCasa di Cura Columbus · ITOspedale Papa Giovanni XXIII · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe human papillomavirus (HPV) is implicated in the pathogenesis of several cancers among humans. The role of HPV as one of the etiological agents in esophageal carcinogenesis is partially unknown. We assessed whether the available evidence supports the association of HPV with risk and prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCCs).

designFor this systematic review and meta-analysis, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and SCOPUS were searched up to February 2021. The included studies were prospective or retrospective studies that evaluated the incidence, risk, and prognosis of HPV-16/18-related ESCCs in adult subjects. The primary outcome was the incidence rate of ESCC in HPV-16/18 carriers. Secondary outcomes included the risk of ESCCs compared with healthy HPV-16/18 carriers (expressed as odds ratios [ORs] with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) and the survival of HPV + versus HPV- ESCCs.

resultsThe search identified 1649 unique citations, of which 145 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the pooled analysis (16,484 patients). The pooled HPV prevalence in ESCCs was 18.2% (95% CI 15.2-21.6%; P < 0.001). A significantly increased ESCC risk was associated with HPV infection (OR = 3.81; 95% CI 2.84-5.11; P < 0.001). Main limitation were methods of HPV detection (DNA only), race of populations included (mainly Asiatic countries) and lack of adjustment for other prognostic factors.

conclusionsThe findings suggest that HPV-16/18 is detectable in about 1 on 5 cases of ESCC with different prevalences across the world. It is moderately but significantly associated with a diagnosis of ESCC. Further epidemiological studies are needed to confirm and increase the current knowledge of the subject.

Indexed as

CarcinogenesisEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaHuman papillomavirus 16Human papillomavirus 18HumansPapillomavirus InfectionsRisk FactorsEsophageal cancerHuman papillomavirusInfectionMeta-analysisRiskSquamous

Identifiers

PMID34273005
PMCPMC11801965
OpenAlexW3179219587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.