Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34272955›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2021

Are synthetic clinical notes useful for real natural language processing tasks: A case study on clinical entity recognition.

Jianfu Li, Yujia Zhou, Xiaoqian Jiang, Karthik Natarajan, Serguei Vs Pakhomov, Hongfang Liu, Hua Xu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Deep learning in the early diagnosis of acute aortic dissection.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Two Directions for Clinical Data Generation with Large Language Models: Data-to-Label and Label-to-Data.Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jianfu LiSchool of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Yujia ZhouSchool of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0889-2261
Xiaoqian JiangSchool of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9933-2205
Karthik NatarajanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9066-9431
Serguei Vs PakhomovCollege of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Hongfang LiuDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Hua XuSchool of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5274-4672
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USColumbia University · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Open Health Natural Language Processing CollaboratoryU01TR002062 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN, LIU, HONGFANG · 2017 to 2021
$7.6M
Dynamic learning for post-vaccine event prediction using temporal information in VAERSR01AI130460 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI CHEN, YONG, TAO, CUI · 2017 to 2021
$3.4M
Advancing Cancer Pharmacoepidemiology Research Through EHRs and InformaticsU24CA194215 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI TAO, CUI, YANG, PING · 2016 to 2020
$3.3M
Informatics Tools for Pharmacogenomic Discovery using Practice-based DataR01GM103859 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DENNY, JOSHUA C., PATHAK, JYOTISHMAN · 2014 to 2017
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA194215NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI130460NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM103859NIH HHS U01TR002062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objective: Developing clinical natural language processing systems often requires access to many clinical documents, which are not widely available to the public due to privacy and security concerns. To address this challenge, we propose to develop methods to generate synthetic clinical notes and evaluate their utility in real clinical natural language processing tasks. MATERIALS AND

methods: We implemented 4 state-of-the-art text generation models, namely CharRNN, SegGAN, GPT-2, and CTRL, to generate clinical text for the History and Present Illness section. We then manually annotated clinical entities for randomly selected 500 History and Present Illness notes generated from the best-performing algorithm. To compare the utility of natural and synthetic corpora, we trained named entity recognition (NER) models from all 3 corpora and evaluated their performance on 2 independent natural corpora.

results: Our evaluation shows GPT-2 achieved the best BLEU (bilingual evaluation understudy) score (with a BLEU-2 of 0.92). NER models trained on synthetic corpus generated by GPT-2 showed slightly better performance on 2 independent corpora: strict F1 scores of 0.709 and 0.748, respectively, when compared with the NER models trained on natural corpus (F1 scores of 0.706 and 0.737, respectively), indicating the good utility of synthetic corpora in clinical NER model development. In addition, we also demonstrated that an augmented method that combines both natural and synthetic corpora achieved better performance than that uses the natural corpus only.

conclusions: Recent advances in text generation have made it possible to generate synthetic clinical notes that could be useful for training NER models for information extraction from natural clinical notes, thus lowering the privacy concern and increasing data availability. Further investigation is needed to apply this technology to practice.

Indexed as

Information Storage and RetrievalNatural Language ProcessingAlgorithmsclinical notesnamed entity recognitionnatural language processingneural language modeltext generation

Identifiers

PMID34272955
PMCPMC8449609
OpenAlexW3178751578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.