Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34272795›Full record

SynthesisColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2021

Caecal diverticulitis can be misdiagnosed as acute appendicitis: a systematic review of the literature.

Isabelle Uhe, Jeremy Meyer, Manuela Viviano, Surrennaidoo Naiken, Christian Toso, Frédéric Ris, Nicolas C Buchs

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Caecal diverticulitis can be misdiagnosed as acute appendicitis: a systematic review of the literature.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Isabelle UheDivision of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Genève, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1224-2296
Jeremy MeyerDivision of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Genève, Switzerland.
Manuela VivianoDivision of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland.
Surrennaidoo NaikenUnit of Surgical Research, University of Geneva, Genève, Switzerland.
Christian TosoDivision of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Genève, Switzerland.
Frédéric RisDivision of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Genève, Switzerland.
Nicolas C BuchsDivision of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Genève, Switzerland.
University of Geneva · CHOspedale regionale di Lugano · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimCaecal diverticulitis (CD) is an uncommon condition which can be misdiagnosed as acute appendicitis due to similar clinical presentations. Further, its management varies among medical centres. The aim of this study was to review cases of patients with CD, to identify the factors differentiating CD from acute appendicitis and to provide a summary of existing diagnostic methods and therapeutic alternatives regarding its management.

methodsThis systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and the AMSTAR2 checklist. We searched MEDLINE and Embase from inception until 1 October 2018 for original publications reporting cases of CD.

resultsOut of the 560 identified studies, 146 publications (988 patients) were included in the qualitative synthesis. Most frequent symptoms of CD were right iliac fossa pain (93.2%), nausea and/or vomiting (35.4%) and fever (26.9%). A total of 443 patients (44.8%) underwent radiological imaging, which reported CD in 225 patients (22.8%). For the other patients, the diagnosis was obtained by surgical exploration (73.9%). Among patients diagnosed with CD by imaging, 67 (29.8%) underwent surgery and 158 (70.2%) were treated conservatively. Among patients who underwent surgical exploration, treatment consisted most frequently of right hemi-colectomy (33%), appendectomy (18.8%) and diverticulectomy with appendectomy (16.3%).

conclusionCD can be misdiagnosed as acute appendicitis, therefore resulting in unnecessary surgical exploration. The review of the literature starting from 1930 highlights the critical role of medical imaging in supporting the clinician to diagnose this condition and administer adequate treatment.

Indexed as

AppendicitisCecal DiseasesDiverticulitisAppendectomyDiagnosis, DifferentialDiagnostic ErrorsHumansappendicitiscaecal diverticulacaecal diverticulitiscolorectal surgerydiagnosistreatment

Identifiers

PMID34272795
PMCPMC9292704
OpenAlexW3180398871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.