Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34272741›Full record

ReviewJournal of cutaneous pathology2022

A clinicopathological description of COVID-19-induced chilblains (COVID-toes) correlated with a published literature review.

Athanassios Kolivras, Curtis Thompson, Ievgenia Pastushenko, Marisa Mathieu, Pascal Bruderer, Marine de Vicq, Francesco Feoli, Saadia Harag, Isabelle Meiers, Catherine Olemans and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cutaneous pathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Cyanotic Fingers and Omicron, Oh My!Indian journal of dermatology
    Article
  14. Pool Toes: A Case Report.Case reports in dermatology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Athanassios KolivrasDepartment of Dermatology, Saint-Pierre, Brugmann and Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospitals, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2542-6935
Curtis ThompsonDepartments of Dermatology and Pathology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0788-346X
Ievgenia PastushenkoLaboratory of Stem Cells and Cancer, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5421-8839
Marisa MathieuDepartment of Dermatology, Saint-Pierre, Brugmann and Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospitals, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Pascal BrudererDepartment of Dermatology, Saint-Pierre, Brugmann and Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospitals, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Marine de VicqDepartment of Dermatology, Saint-Pierre, Brugmann and Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospitals, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Francesco FeoliDepartment of Dermatology, Saint-Pierre, Brugmann and Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospitals, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Saadia HaragDepartment of Dermatology, Saint-Pierre, Brugmann and Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospitals, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Isabelle MeiersDepartment of Dermatology, Saint-Pierre, Brugmann and Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospitals, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Catherine OlemansDepartment of Dermatology, Saint-Pierre, Brugmann and Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospitals, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Ursula SassDepartment of Dermatology, Saint-Pierre, Brugmann and Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospitals, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Florence DehavayDepartment of Dermatology, Saint-Pierre, Brugmann and Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospitals, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Ali FakihDepartment of Dermatology, Saint-Pierre, Brugmann and Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospitals, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Xuan-Lan Lam-HoaiDepartment of Dermatology, Saint-Pierre, Brugmann and Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospitals, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Alice MarneffeDepartment of Dermatology, Saint-Pierre, Brugmann and Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospitals, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Laura Van De BorneDepartment of Dermatology, Saint-Pierre, Brugmann and Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospitals, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Valerie VandersleyenDepartment of Dermatology, Saint-Pierre, Brugmann and Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospitals, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Bertrand RichertDepartment of Dermatology, Saint-Pierre, Brugmann and Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospitals, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4144-6602

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe abundance of publications of COVID-19-induced chilblains has resulted in a confusing situation.

methodsThis is a prospective single-institution study from 15 March to 13 May 2020. Thirty-two patients received PCR nasopharyngeal swabs. Of these, 28 patients had a thoracic CT-scan, 31 patients had blood and urine examinations, 24 patients had skin biopsies including immunohistochemical and direct immunofluorescence studies, and four patients had electron microscopy.

resultsCOVID-19-induced chilblains are clinically and histopathologically identical to chilblains from other causes. Although intravascular thrombi are sometimes observed, no patient had a systemic coagulopathy or severe clinical course. The exhaustive clinical, radiological, and laboratory work-up in this study ruled-out other primary and secondary causes. Electron microscopy revealed rare, probable viral particles whose core and spikes measured from 120 to 133 nm within endothelium and eccrine glands in two cases.

conclusionThis study provides further clinicopathologic evidence of COVID-19-related chilblains. Negative PCR and antibody tests do not rule-out infection. Chilblains represent a good prognosis, occurring later in the disease course. No systemic coagulopathy was identified in any patient. Patients presenting with acral lesions should be isolated, and chilblains should be distinguished from thrombotic lesions (livedo racemosa, retiform purpura, or ischemic acral necrosis).

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBiopsyChilblainsChildCOVID-19Diagnosis, DifferentialEccrine GlandsEndotheliumFemaleHumansLivedo ReticularisMaleMicroscopy, ElectronMiddle AgedchilblainscoagulationcoagulopathyCOVID-19COVID-toesCT-scandirect immunofluorescence studyelectron microscopyhistopathologyhypercoagulableimmunohistochemistryinterferonlivedo racemosalupus erythematosusparaviralretiform purpurasevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)thrombi

Identifiers

PMID34272741
PMCPMC8444728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.