ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2022
Surgeon satisfaction and outcomes of tele-proctoring for robotic gynecologic surgery.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness of tele-proctoring in robotic surgery: systematic review of different robotic platforms.World journal of urology · 2025Pooled it
- A Smarter Health through the Internet of Surgical Things.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Pooled it
- Multi-perspective analysis of daVinci surgical virtual reality training: a prospective randomized controlled study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Trial
- First report: International proctoring of robotic colorectal surgery using TELEPROSurgery today · 2025Article
- Ambiguity in robotic surgical instruction: lessons from remote and in-person simulation.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2025Article
- Feasibility of transcontinental coaching of complex robotic thoracic surgical procedures: A bronchial anastomosis on a 3-dimensional model.JTCVS techniques · 2025Article
- Proctoring in robot-assisted urologic surgery: insights from a multicenter survey.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- A national cross-sectional analysis of stakeholder views regarding the practice and governance of robotic surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Development and evaluation of an international teleproctoring program for bronchoscopic procedures.iScience · 2025Article
- Initiation of a robotic pancreatoduodenectomy program using virtual collaboration.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2024Article
- Telementoring Experience for Complex Bariatric Operation-Laparoscopic Single-Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy (SADI-S).Obesity surgery · 2024Article
- Tele-proctoring for minimally invasive surgery across Japan: An initial step toward a new approach to improving the disparity of surgical care and supporting surgical education.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2024Article
- Teleproctoring in therapeutic neurointervention: Experience from Iraq-Saudi Arabia collaboration.Surgical neurology international · 2024Article
- [The Importance of Feedback in Proctoring in Robotic Surgery - a Cornerstone of the Concept of Success?]Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie · 2023Article
- In the Hands of a Robot, From the Operating Room to the Courtroom: The Medicolegal Considerations of Robotic Surgery.Cureus · 2023Review
- Asian Young Doctors Session at the 64th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society for Gynecologic Oncology (JSGO): Educational Initiatives in the Next Generation for a New Era after the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2023Article
- Shared Learning Utilizing Digital Methods in Surgery to Enhance Transparency in Surgical Innovation: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Surgical proctoring requires increasing resources in growing healthcare systems. In addition, travel has become less safe in the era of COVID-19. This study demonstrates surgeon satisfaction and safety with tele-proctoring in robotic gynecologic surgery. This pilot study assesses surgeon satisfaction and operative outcomes with a novel operative tele-proctoring system with a continuous two-way video-audio feed that allows the off-site surgeon to see the operating room, surgical field, and hands of the robotic surgeon. After thorough system testing, two experienced surgeons underwent tele-proctoring for hospital credentialing, completing 7 total cases. Each completed pre- and post-surveys developed from the Michigan Standard Simulation Experience Scale. Surgical characteristics were compared between tele-proctored cases and 59 historical cases proctored in-person over the last 8 years. Surgeons reported unanimous high satisfaction with tele-proctoring (5 ± 0). There were no major technologic issues. Five of the tele-proctored cases and 35 of controls were hysterectomies. Mean age was 48.2 ± 1.4 years, mean BMI was 29.6 ± 0.9 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.