ReviewCurrent oncology reports2021
Post-Induction Treatment for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Something Change?
Review in Current oncology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost-effectiveness of upfront vs delayed allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant for intermediate risk AML.Blood advances · 2025Article
- [Comparison of the efficacy of continuous VA chemotherapy and I/HDAC consolidation in postremission therapy for acute myeloid leukemia fit for standard chemotherapy].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2025Article
- AML consolidation therapy: timing matters.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Update on current treatments for adult acute myeloid leukemia: to treat acute myeloid leukemia intensively or non-intensively? That is the question.Haematologica · 2023Review
- Circular RNA SPI1 expression before and after induction therapy and its correlation with clinical features, treatment response, and survival of acute myeloid leukemia patients.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewUntil recently, improvement in terms of survival for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) was achieved mostly in younger patients with dose intensification of conventional chemotherapy and a broadening use of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) whereas the results remained dismal and very stable in patients older than 60 years. The current review highlights the recent developments in standard intensive post-remission chemotherapy, evidence for the use of recently approved agents, and discusses the relevance of measurable residual disease (MRD) measurement in treatment adaptation. RECENT
findingsCurrent approvals of midostaurin, venetoclax, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, VYXEOS, ivosidenib, enasidenib, glasdegib, and CC-486 have changed the structure, aim, and schedule of consolidation therapy, and new, well-tolerated agents are being evaluated as maintenance therapies. Furthermore, MRD assessment has been implemented to guide the duration and type of consolidation and maintenance therapy as well as indicate the optimal timing of allo-HCT. Novel therapies have changed the structure and perspective of post-remission therapy in AML for both young and elderly patients. In addition, MRD assessment could guide the type, duration, and intensity of consolidation and maintenance therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.