ArticleUrolithiasis2022
Should we treat asymptomatic concurrent contralateral renal stones? A longitudinal analysis.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Intervention versus observation for asymptomatic kidney stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.World journal of urology · 2026Pooled it
- Removal of Small, Asymptomatic Kidney Stones and Incidence of Relapse.The New England journal of medicine · 2022Trial
- A study of the difference in biochemical metabolism between patients with unilateral and bilateral upper urinary tract stones.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Improving Outcomes of Same-sitting Bilateral Flexible Ureteroscopy for Renal Stones in Real-world Practice-Lessons Learnt from Global Multicenter Experience of 1250 Patients.European urology open science · 2023Article
- Should we support prophylactic intervention for asymptomatic kidney stones? A retrospective cohort study with long-term follow-up.Urolithiasis · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective is to explore the need for future surgery among patients treated for asymptomatic concurrent contralateral stones versus those that were not. Upon IRB approval, we retrospectively reviewed records of patients who underwent stone surgeries (SWL, URS, PCNL) from 2009 to 2018. Patients were included if they were greater than 18 years old, had a minimum follow-up of 2 years, and had pre-operative imaging. Patients were divided into three groups: bilateral surgery, ipsilateral surgery with, and without asymptomatic concurrent contralateral stones. Cox regression was used to analyze patients' need for future surgery while controlling demographic and comorbid characteristics. Of the 1666 patients included, 51.9% were men. They were 59.7 ± 15 years and had a BMI of 31.3 ± 8.2 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
34272594What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.