Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34272569›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2022

Effect of Predation by Colpoda sp. in Nitrogen Fixation Rate of Two Free-Living Bacteria.

Carlos Manuel Martínez-Reyes, Salvador Rodríguez-Zaragoza, Nathalie Cabirol, Alejandro Alarcón, Ma Remedios Mendoza-López

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Influence of seasonal humidity and nitrogen on soil ciliate and bacterial diversity beneath the canopy of Neltuma laevigata.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Carlos Manuel Martínez-ReyesLaboratorio de Ecología Microbiana, UBIPRO, FES-IZTACALA UNAM, Av. de los Barrios #1 Col. Los Reyes Iztacala, Tlalnepantla, 54090, Estado de México, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2048-1035
Salvador Rodríguez-ZaragozaLaboratorio de Ecología Microbiana, UBIPRO, FES-IZTACALA UNAM, Av. de los Barrios #1 Col. Los Reyes Iztacala, Tlalnepantla, 54090, Estado de México, México. srodrige@unam.mx.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1492-1284
Nathalie CabirolDepartamento de Ecología y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM, México City, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7949-5904
Alejandro AlarcónMicrobiología de Suelos, Posgrado Edafología, Colegio de Postgraduados, Campus Montecillo, Carretera México-Texcoco km. 36.5, Montecillo, 56230, Estado de México, México.
Ma Remedios Mendoza-LópezSARA, Universidad Veracruzana, Av. Dr. Luis Castelazo s/n, Col. Industrial-Ánimas, Xalapa, 91000, Veracruz, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6441-4558
Autonomous University of Tlaxcala · MXColegio de Postgraduados · MXUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXUniversidad Veracruzana · MX

Funding

PAPIIT IN222618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological nitrogen fixation is limited to several groups of prokaryotes, some of them reduce nitrogen as free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Protozoa predation on these latter releases sequestered nitrogen that may enhance the formation of new bacterial biomass and possibly increase nitrogen fixation within soil microbial communities. We aim to evaluate the predation effect of Colpoda sp. on two nitrogen fixers: Azospirillum lipoferum and Stenotrophomonas sp. during their lag, early exponential, and exponential phases. The kinetics of bacterial population growth was determined in the predators' presence or absence and the effect of predation on the rate of N fixation was evaluated through the reduction of acetylene to ethylene technique. Colpoda sp. showed a non-significant difference in preferences between the two species offered as prey. Consequently, the abundance of A. lipoferum and Stenotrophomonas sp. decreased significantly due to predator's pressure and both species responded by increasing their specific growth rate. Likewise, predation promoted greater nitrogen fixation rate by CFU during the lag phase in A. lipoferum (0.20 nM/CFU with predation vs 0.09 nM/CFU without predation) and Stenotrophomonas sp. (0.22 nM/CFU vs 0.09 nM/CFU respectively). During early exponential phase (29 h), the rate diminished to 0.13 and 0.05 nM/CFU in A. lipoferum and to 0.09 nM/CFU and 0.05 nM/CFU in Stenotrophomonas sp. Finally, during the exponential phase (52 h), only A. lipoferum without predation produced 0.003 nM/CFU of ethylene. Thus, the nitrogenase activity was higher in the lag and the early exponential phases when predator activity was involved.

Indexed as

CiliophoraNitrogen FixationAnimalsBacteriaNitrogenPredatory BehaviorNitrogenBacterial specific growth rateColpoda predation on bacteriaFree-living nitrogen-fixing bacteriaNitrogen fixation rate under predation

Identifiers

PMID34272569
OpenAlexW3131354491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.