Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34272512›Full record

ReviewEye (London, England)2021

What can visual electrophysiology tell about possible visual-field defects in paediatric patients.

Siân E Handley, Maja Šuštar, Manca Tekavčič Pompe

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eye (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Clinical Use of Retinotopy in Functional Hemianopia.Neuro-ophthalmology (Aeolus Press) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The diagnostic value of multichannel VEPs for children without nystagmus.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Diagnostic performance of pupil perimetry in detecting hemianopia under standard and virtual reality viewing conditions.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Siân E HandleyUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK. sian.handley.10@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7612-3889
Maja ŠuštarUnit for Visual Electrophysiology and Paediatric Ophthalmology Department, Eye Hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Manca Tekavčič PompeUnit for Visual Electrophysiology and Paediatric Ophthalmology Department, Eye Hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3730-0229
Ljubljana University Medical Centre · SIGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health NIHR300562
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recognising a potential visual-field (VF) defect in paediatric patients might be challenging, especially in children before the age of 5 years and those with developmental delay or intellectual disability. Visual electrophysiological testing is an objective and non-invasive technique for evaluation of visual function in paediatric patients, which can characterise the location of dysfunction and differentiate between disorders of the retina, optic nerve and visual pathway. The recording of electroretinography (ERG) and visual-evoked potentials (VEP) is possible from early days of life and requires no subjective input from the patient. As the origins of ERG and VEP tests are known, the pattern of electrophysiological changes can provide information about the VF of a child unable to perform accurate perimetry. This review summarises previously published electrophysiological findings in several common types of VF defects that can be found in paediatric patients (generalised VF defect, peripheral VF loss, central scotoma, bi-temporal hemianopia, altitudinal VF defect, quadrantanopia and homonymous hemianopia). It also shares experience on using electrophysiological testing as additional functional evidence to other tests in the clinical challenge of diagnosing or excluding VF defects in complex paediatric patients. Each type of VF defect is illustrated with one or two clinical cases.

Indexed as

Visual FieldsVisual Field TestsChildChild, PreschoolElectrophysiologyElectroretinographyEvoked Potentials, VisualHemianopsiaHumansVision Disorders

Identifiers

PMID34272512
PMCPMC8377065
OpenAlexW3179022628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.