Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34272511›Full record

SynthesisEye (London, England)2022

Eye disease and mortality, cognition, disease, and modifiable risk factors: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies.

Mike Trott, Lee Smith, Nicola Veronese, Damiano Pizzol, Yvonne Barnett, Trish Gorely, Shahina Pardhan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Eye (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Eye Care Behaviors among Adults in Poland: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mike TrottVision and Eye Research Institute (VERI), School of Medicine, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK. mike.trott@aru.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5978-3407
Lee SmithThe Cambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Nicola VeroneseNational Research Council, Neuroscience Institute, Aging Branch, Padua, Italy.
Damiano PizzolItalian Agency for Development Cooperation (Khartoum), Khartoum, Sudan.
Yvonne BarnettSchool of Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Trish GorelyDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, University of the Highlands and Islands, Centre for Health Sciences, Inverness, UK.
Shahina PardhanVision and Eye Research Institute (VERI), School of Medicine, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Anglia Ruskin University · GBNeuroscience Institute · ITUniversity of the Highlands and Islands · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, 2.2 billion people live with some form of vision impairment and/or eye disease. To date, most systematic reviews examining associations have focused on a single eye disease and there is no systematic evaluation of the relationships between eye diseases and diverse physical and mental health outcomes. Moreover, the strength and reliability of the literature is unclear. We performed an umbrella review of observational studies with meta analyses for any physical and/or mental comorbidities associated with eye disease. For each association, random-effects summary effect size, heterogeneity, small-study effect, excess significance bias and 95% prediction intervals were calculated, and used to grade significant evidence from convincing to weak. 34 studies were included covering 58 outcomes. No outcomes yielded convincing evidence, six outcomes yielded highly suggestive results (cataract positively associated with type 2 diabetes, open-angled glaucoma positively associated with myopia and diabetes, diabetic retinopathy positively associated with cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular mortality, and retinopathy of prematurity positively associated with chorioamnionitis), eight outcomes yielded suggestive results (diabetic retinopathy positively associated with all-cause mortality and depression, diabetic macular oedema positively associated with dyslipidaemia, cataract positively associated with gout, nuclear sclerosis positively associated with all-cause mortality, open angled glaucoma positively associated with migraine and hypertension, and age-related macular degeneration positively associated with diabetes), and 18 outcomes yielded weak evidence. Results show highly suggestive or suggestive evidence for associations between several types of eye diseases with several comorbid outcomes. Practitioners and public health policies should note these findings when developing healthcare policies.

Indexed as

CataractDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic RetinopathyGlaucomaCognitionFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornObservational Studies as TopicPregnancyReproducibility of ResultsRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID34272511
PMCPMC8807837
OpenAlexW3180577665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.