Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34272365›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Associations between dimensions of behaviour, personality traits, and mental-health during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom.

Adam Hampshire, Peter J Hellyer, Eyal Soreq, Mitul A Mehta, Konstantinos Ioannidis, William Trender, Jon E Grant, Samuel R Chamberlain

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. COVID-19 and resultant restrictions on gambling behaviour.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Adam HampshireImperial College London, London, UK. a.hampshire@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5176-5420
Peter J HellyerImperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5139-3401
Eyal SoreqImperial College London, London, UK.
Mitul A MehtaKing's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1152-5323
Konstantinos IoannidisCambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1537-5425
William TrenderImperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3947-5532
Jon E GrantDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Samuel R ChamberlainDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7014-8121

Funding

Department of Health II-LB-0715-20006Medical Research Council MR/R005370/1Wellcome Trust 110049Wellcome Trust 110049/Z/15/AWellcome Trust 110049/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic (including lockdown) is likely to have had profound but diverse implications for mental health and well-being, yet little is known about individual experiences of the pandemic (positive and negative) and how this relates to mental health and well-being, as well as other important contextual variables. Here, we analyse data sampled in a large-scale manner from 379,875 people in the United Kingdom (UK) during 2020 to identify population variables associated with mood and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to investigate self-perceived pandemic impact in relation to those variables. We report that while there are relatively small population-level differences in mood assessment scores pre- to peak-UK lockdown, the size of the differences is larger for people from specific groups, e.g. older adults and people with lower incomes. Multiple dimensions underlie peoples' perceptions, both positive and negative, of the pandemic's impact on daily life. These dimensions explain variance in mental health and can be statistically predicted from age, demographics, home and work circumstances, pre-existing conditions, maladaptive technology use and personality traits (e.g., compulsivity). We conclude that a holistic view, incorporating the broad range of relevant population factors, can better characterise people whose mental health is most at risk during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

Mental HealthPandemicsPersonalityAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBehaviorCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Surveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34272365
PMCPMC8285408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.