Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34272362›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Francisella tularensis induces Th1 like MAIT cells conferring protection against systemic and local infection.

Zhe Zhao, Huimeng Wang, Mai Shi, Tianyuan Zhu, Troi Pediongco, Xin Yi Lim, Bronwyn S Meehan, Adam G Nelson, David P Fairlie, Jeffrey Y W Mak and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Gut archaea drive human MAIT cell responses.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Avoidance of MAIT cells is an essential determinant ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. ReprogrammingmBio · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Guardians within: Cross-talk between the gut microbiome and host immune system.World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. MAIT cells: Conserved watchers on the wall.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2025
    Review
  17. The immune response toFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. MR1 presents vitamin B6-related compounds for recognition by MR1-reactive T cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Zhe Zhao *Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1009-324X
Huimeng Wang *Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0226-3982
Mai Shi *Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1046-1391
Tianyuan ZhuDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2308-0651
Troi PediongcoDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Xin Yi LimDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9806-5894
Bronwyn S MeehanDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Adam G NelsonDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
David P FairlieDivision of Chemistry and Structural Biology, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7856-8566
Jeffrey Y W MakDivision of Chemistry and Structural Biology, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8011-4539
Sidonia B G EckleDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0766-171X
Marcela de Lima MoreiraDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3477-0727
Carolin TumpachDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Michael BramhallDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5938-158X
Cameron G WilliamsDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Hyun Jae LeeDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Ashraful HaqueDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2260-0026
Maximilien EvrardDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jamie RossjohnInfection and Immunity Program and the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2020-7522
James McCluskeyDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. jamesm1@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8597-815X
Alexandra J Corbett *Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. corbetta@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1618-4337
Zhenjun Chen *Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. zhenjun@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1205-683X
The University of Melbourne · AUAustralian Research Council · AU

Funding

Investigating the basis of MAIT cell antigen potencyR01AI148407 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE · PI MCCLUSKEY, JAMES · 2020 to 2024
$2.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI148407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mucosal-associated Invariant T (MAIT) cells are recognized for their antibacterial functions. The protective capacity of MAIT cells has been demonstrated in murine models of local infection, including in the lungs. Here we show that during systemic infection of mice with Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain results in evident MAIT cell expansion in the liver, lungs, kidney and spleen and peripheral blood. The responding MAIT cells manifest a polarised Th1-like MAIT-1 phenotype, including transcription factor and cytokine profile, and confer a critical role in controlling bacterial load. Post resolution of the primary infection, the expanded MAIT cells form stable memory-like MAIT-1 cell populations, suggesting a basis for vaccination. Indeed, a systemic vaccination with synthetic antigen 5-(2-oxopropylideneamino)-6-D-ribitylaminouracil in combination with CpG adjuvant similarly boosts MAIT cells, and results in enhanced protection against both systemic and local infections with different bacteria. Our study highlights the potential utility of targeting MAIT cells to combat a range of bacterial pathogens.

Indexed as

Immunity, InnateAdjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsCytokinesFrancisella tularensisHistocompatibility Antigens Class ILiverLungMiceMice, KnockoutMinor Histocompatibility AntigensMucosal-Associated Invariant T CellsPhenotypeRibitolRNA-SeqSingle-Cell Analysis5-(2-oxopropylideneamino)-6-d-ribitylaminouracilAdjuvants, ImmunologicCytokinesHistocompatibility Antigens Class IMinor Histocompatibility AntigensMr1 protein, mouseRibitolUracilVaccines, Attenuated

Identifiers

PMID34272362
PMCPMC8285429
OpenAlexW3179327051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.