Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34271990›Full record

ArticleGenes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society2021

In vivo and in vitro mutagenicity of perillaldehyde and cinnamaldehyde.

Masamitsu Honma, Masami Yamada, Manabu Yasui, Katsuyoshi Horibata, Kei-Ichi Sugiyama, Kenichi Masumura

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Masamitsu HonmaDivision of Genetics and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Health Sciences, 3-2-26 Tonomachi, Kawasaki City, Kanagawa, 210-9501, Japan. honma@nihs.go.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7805-3290
Masami YamadaDivision of Genetics and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Health Sciences, 3-2-26 Tonomachi, Kawasaki City, Kanagawa, 210-9501, Japan.
Manabu YasuiDivision of Genetics and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Health Sciences, 3-2-26 Tonomachi, Kawasaki City, Kanagawa, 210-9501, Japan.
Katsuyoshi HoribataDivision of Genetics and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Health Sciences, 3-2-26 Tonomachi, Kawasaki City, Kanagawa, 210-9501, Japan.
Kei-Ichi SugiyamaDivision of Genetics and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Health Sciences, 3-2-26 Tonomachi, Kawasaki City, Kanagawa, 210-9501, Japan.
Kenichi MasumuraDivision of Genetics and Mutagenesis, National Institute of Health Sciences, 3-2-26 Tonomachi, Kawasaki City, Kanagawa, 210-9501, Japan.
National Institute of Health Sciences · JPNational Institute of Health Sciences · LK

Funding

Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare H30-Chemistry-Destination-005Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare H30-Food-General-003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerillaldehyde and cinnamaldehyde are natural substances found in plants that are used as flavoring ingredients. Due to the α,β-unsaturated aldehydes in their structures, these compounds are expected to be DNA reactive. Indeed, several reports have indicated that perillaldehyde and cinnamaldehyde show positive in in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity tests. However, their genotoxic potentials are currently disputed. To clarify the mutagenicity of perillaldehyde and cinnamaldehyde, we conducted in silico quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) analysis, in vitro Ames tests, and in vivo transgenic rodent gene mutation (TGR) assays.

resultsIn Ames tests, perillaldehyde was negative and cinnamaldehyde was positive; these respective results were supported by QSAR analysis. In TGR assays, we treated Muta™ Mice with perillaldehyde and gpt-delta mice with cinnamaldehyde up to the maximum tested doses (1000 mg/kg/day). There was no increase in gene mutations in the liver, glandular stomach, or small intestine following all treatments except the positive control (N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea at 100 mg/kg/day).

conclusionsThese data clearly show no evidence of in vivo mutagenic potentials of perillaldehyde and cinnamaldehyde (administered up to 1000 mg/kg/day) in mice; however, cinnamaldehyde is mutagenic in vitro.

Indexed as

Ames testCinnamaldehydeMutagenicityPerillaldehydeQuantitative structure–activity relationshipTransgenic rodent gene mutation assay

Identifiers

PMID34271990
PMCPMC8284016
OpenAlexW3178837676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.