Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34271969›Full record

SynthesisAlzheimer's research & therapy2021

Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy for Alzheimer's disease and for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia in older patients with moderate and severe functional impairments: a systematic review of controlled trials.

M Seibert, V Mühlbauer, J Holbrook, S Voigt-Radloff, S Brefka, D Dallmeier, M Denkinger, C Schönfeldt-Lecuona, S Klöppel, C A F von Arnim

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Antidepressant Use Among US Nursing Home Residents With Dementia.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A National Survey of Nursing Home Clinicians to Explain Increased Valproate Prescribing.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Social Isolation, Sleep Disturbance, and Cognitive Functioning (HRS): A Longitudinal Mediation Study.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. CaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

M SeibertDepartment of Neurology, University Clinic Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
V MühlbauerAgaplesion Bethesda Clinic, Institute for Geriatric Research, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
J HolbrookDepartment of Neurology, University Clinic Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
S Voigt-RadloffCenter for Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
S BrefkaAgaplesion Bethesda Clinic, Institute for Geriatric Research, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
D DallmeierAgaplesion Bethesda Clinic, Institute for Geriatric Research, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
M DenkingerAgaplesion Bethesda Clinic, Institute for Geriatric Research, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
C Schönfeldt-LecuonaGeriatric Center Ulm/Alb-Donau, Ulm, Germany.
S KlöppelUniversity Hospital of Old Age Psychiatry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
C A F von ArnimGeriatric Center Ulm/Alb-Donau, Ulm, Germany. christine.arnim@med.uni-goettingen.de.
Agaplesion Bethesda Klinik · DEUniversity and Rehabilitation Clinics Ulm · DEUniversity of Bern · CHUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) are physically frail or have substantial functional impairments. There is growing evidence that such patients are at higher risk for medication-induced adverse events. Furthermore, frailty seems to be more predictive of poor clinical outcomes than chronological age alone. To our knowledge, no systematic review of clinical trials examining drug therapy of AD or behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) has specifically focused on the topic of physical frailty. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in AD patients with frailty or significant functional impairments.

methodsWe performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of drug therapy of AD and BPSD in patients with significant functional impairments according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and Cochrane research criteria. Significant functionally impaired patient populations were identified using the recommendations of the Medication and Quality of Life in frail older persons (MedQoL) Research Group. Screening, selection of studies, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Outcomes including functional status, cognitive function, changes in BPSD symptoms, clinical global impression and quality of life were analysed. For assessing harm, we assessed adverse events, drop-outs as a proxy for treatment tolerability and death. Results were analysed according to Cochrane standards and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

resultsOf 45,045 search results, 38,447 abstracts and 187 full texts were screened, and finally, 10 RCTs were included in the systematic review. Selected articles evaluated pharmacotherapy with acetylcholinesterase-inhibitors (AChEI), anticonvulsants, antidepressants and antipsychotics. Studies of AChEIs suggested that patients with significant functional impairments had slight but significant improvements in cognition and that AChEIs were generally well tolerated. Studies of antidepressants did not show significant improvements in depressive symptoms. Antipsychotics and anticonvulsants showed small effects on some BPSD items but also higher rates of adverse events. However, due to the very small number of identified trials, the quality of evidence for all outcomes was low to very low. Overall, the small number of eligible studies demonstrates that significantly functional impaired older patients have not been adequately taken into consideration in most clinical trials investigating drug therapy of AD and BPSD.

conclusionDue to lack of evidence, it is not possible to give specific recommendations for drug therapy of AD and BSPD in frail older patients or older patients with significant functional impairments. Therefore, clinical trials focussing on frail older adults are urgently required. A standardized approach to physical frailty in future clinical studies is highly desirable.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAntipsychotic AgentsAgedAged, 80 and overCholinesterase InhibitorsCognitionHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntipsychotic AgentsCholinesterase InhibitorsAlzheimer’s diseaseBPSDDementiaDrug therapyFrail elderlySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34271969
PMCPMC8285815
OpenAlexW3179525092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.