Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34271923›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2021

Development of clinical competence - a longitudinal survey of nurse practitioner students.

I Taylor, P C Bing-Jonsson, E Finnbakk, S Wangensteen, L Sandvik, L Fagerström

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

I TaylorFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway (USN), P. O. Box 235, 3603, Kongsberg, Norway. ingrid.taylor@usn.no.
P C Bing-JonssonFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway (USN), P. O. Box 235, 3603, Kongsberg, Norway.
E FinnbakkLovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway.
S WangensteenFaculty of Medicine and Health Science in Gjøvik, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Gjøvik, Norway.
L SandvikFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway (USN), P. O. Box 235, 3603, Kongsberg, Norway.
L FagerströmFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway (USN), P. O. Box 235, 3603, Kongsberg, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn order to achieve a sustainable standard of advanced clinical competence for nurse practitioners leading to a credible role, it is important to investigate the development of clinical competence among nurse practitioner students.

aimThe aim of the present study is to analyse the development of nurse practitioner students' self-assessed clinical competence from the beginning of their education to after completion of their clinical studies.

designThe study involved the application of a longitudinal survey design adhering to STROBE guidelines.

methodsThe participants consisted of 36 registered nurses from a nurse practitioner programme at a Norwegian university. The Professional Nurse Self-Assessment Scale II was used for data collection during the period August 2015 to May 2020.

resultsThe students developed their clinical competence the most for direct clinical practice. Our findings are inconclusive in terms of whether the students developed clinical competence regarding consultation, coaching and guidance, and collaboration. However, they do indicate a lack of development in some aspects of clinical leadership. The students with the lowest level of clinical competence developed their clinical competence regarding direct clinical practice significantly more than the students with the highest level of clinical competence. The differences between students with high and low levels of clinical competence were levelled out during their education. Thus, the students as a whole became a more homogenous group after completion of their clinical studies. Previous work experience in primary healthcare was a statistically significant, yet minor, predictor of the development of clinical competence.

conclusionOur findings indicate that the students developed their clinical competence for direct clinical practice in accordance with the intended learning outcomes of the university's Master's programme and international standards for nurse practitioners. It is imperative that the clinical field supports nurse practitioners by facilitating extended work-task fits that are appropriate to their newly developed clinical competence. We refrain from concluding with a recommendation that prior clinical work experience should be an entry requirement for nurse practitioner programmes. However, we recommend an evaluation of the nurse practitioner education programme with the aim of investigating whether the curriculum meets the academic standards of clinical leadership expected in advanced level of nursing.

Indexed as

Advanced practice nursingClinical competenceDevelopmentNurse educationNurse practitionerSelf-assessment

Identifiers

PMID34271923
PMCPMC8283382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.