Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34271900›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2021

Core of the saliva microbiome: an analysis of the MG-RAST data.

Simone G Oliveira, Rafaela R Nishiyama, Claudio A C Trigo, Ana Luiza Mattos-Guaraldi, Alberto M R Dávila, Rodrigo Jardim, Flavio H B Aguiar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Simone G Oliveira *Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Av. Limeira, 901, Piracicaba, Brazil.
Rafaela R NishiyamaDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Av. Limeira, 901, Piracicaba, Brazil.
Claudio A C TrigoDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Av. Limeira, 901, Piracicaba, Brazil.
Ana Luiza Mattos-GuaraldiLaboratory of Diphtheria and Corynebacteria of Clinical Relevance, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Rio de Janeiro State University, Boulevard 28 de setembro, 77, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Alberto M R DávilaComputational and Systems Biology Laboratory, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Av. Brasil, 4365, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rodrigo Jardim *Computational and Systems Biology Laboratory, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Av. Brasil, 4365, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. rodrigo.jardim@fiocruz.br.
Flavio H B AguiarDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Av. Limeira, 901, Piracicaba, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOral microbiota is considered as the second most complex in the human body and its dysbiosis can be responsible for oral diseases. Interactions between the microorganism communities and the host allow establishing the microbiological proles. Identifying the core microbiome is essential to predicting diseases and changes in environmental behavior from microorganisms.

methodsProjects containing the term "SALIVA", deposited between 2014 and 2019 were recovered on the MG-RAST portal. Quality (Failed), taxonomic prediction (Unknown and Predicted), species richness (Rarefaction), and species diversity (Alpha) were analyzed according to sequencing approaches (Amplicon sequencing and Shotgun metagenomics). All data were checked for normality and homoscedasticity. Metagenomic projects were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test and Spearman's correlation. Microbiome cores were inferred by Principal Component Analysis. For all statistical tests, p < 0.05 was used.

resultsThe study was performed with 3 projects, involving 245 Amplicon and 164 Shotgun metagenome datasets. All comparisons of variables, according to the type of sequencing, showed significant differences, except for the Predicted. In Shotgun metagenomics datasets the highest correlation was between Rarefaction and Failed (r =  - 0.78) and the lowest between Alpha and Unknown (r =  - 0.12). In Amplicon sequencing datasets, the variables Rarefaction and Unknown (r = 0.63) had the highest correlation and the lowest was between Alpha and Predicted (r =  - 0.03). Shotgun metagenomics datasets showed a greater number of genera than Amplicon. Propionibacterium, Lactobacillus, and Prevotella were the most representative genera in Amplicon sequencing. In Shotgun metagenomics, the most representative genera were Escherichia, Chitinophaga, and Acinetobacter.

conclusionsCore of the salivary microbiome and genera diversity are dependent on the sequencing approaches. Available data suggest that Shotgun metagenomics and Amplicon sequencing have similar sensitivities to detect the taxonomic level investigated, although Shotgun metagenomics allows a deeper analysis of the microorganism diversity. Microbiome studies must consider characteristics and limitations of the sequencing approaches. Were identified 20 genera in the core of saliva microbiome, regardless of the health condition of the host. Some bacteria of the core need further study to better understand their role in the oral cavity.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaSalivaBacteriaHumansMetagenomeMetagenomicsAmplicon sequencingeHOMDMG-RASTMicrobiome coreSalivaShotgun metagenomics

Identifiers

PMID34271900
PMCPMC8283749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.