ArticleBMC oral health2021
Core of the saliva microbiome: an analysis of the MG-RAST data.
Article in BMC oral health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Species-level taxonomic characterization enhances the power of saliva and feces stain microbiota for inferring the time since deposition (TsD).International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- The Dentin Microbiome: A Metatranscriptomic Evaluation of Caries-Associated Bacteria.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Salivary microbiota dysbiosis and elevated polyamine levels contribute to the severity of periodontal disease.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Human Salivary Microbiota Diversity According to Ethnicity, Sex, TRPV1 Variants and Sensitivity to Capsaicin.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- The gut microbiota facilitate their host tolerance to extreme temperatures.BMC microbiology · 2024Article
- Shotgun metagenomic analysis of saliva microbiome suggests Mogibacterium as a factor associated with chronic bacterial osteomyelitis.PloS one · 2024Article
- Combined analysis of the microbiome and metabolome to reveal the characteristics of saliva from different diets: a comparison among vegans, seafood-based omnivores, and red meat (beef and lamb) omnivores.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Oral microbiota and metabolites: key players in oral health and disorder, and microbiota-based therapies.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Development and application of a multiplex PCR system for forensic salivary identification.International journal of legal medicine · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the correlation between oral infections and systemic complications in kidney transplant patients: a retrospective pilot study.BMC oral health · 2022Article
- The salivary microbiome shows a high prevalence of core bacterial members yet variability across human populations.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2022Article
- Sonication versus the conventional method for evaluation of the dental microbiome: a prospective pilot study.BMC oral health · 2022Article
- The Oral Microbiota: Community Composition, Influencing Factors, Pathogenesis, and Interventions.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOral microbiota is considered as the second most complex in the human body and its dysbiosis can be responsible for oral diseases. Interactions between the microorganism communities and the host allow establishing the microbiological proles. Identifying the core microbiome is essential to predicting diseases and changes in environmental behavior from microorganisms.
methodsProjects containing the term "SALIVA", deposited between 2014 and 2019 were recovered on the MG-RAST portal. Quality (Failed), taxonomic prediction (Unknown and Predicted), species richness (Rarefaction), and species diversity (Alpha) were analyzed according to sequencing approaches (Amplicon sequencing and Shotgun metagenomics). All data were checked for normality and homoscedasticity. Metagenomic projects were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test and Spearman's correlation. Microbiome cores were inferred by Principal Component Analysis. For all statistical tests, p < 0.05 was used.
resultsThe study was performed with 3 projects, involving 245 Amplicon and 164 Shotgun metagenome datasets. All comparisons of variables, according to the type of sequencing, showed significant differences, except for the Predicted. In Shotgun metagenomics datasets the highest correlation was between Rarefaction and Failed (r = - 0.78) and the lowest between Alpha and Unknown (r = - 0.12). In Amplicon sequencing datasets, the variables Rarefaction and Unknown (r = 0.63) had the highest correlation and the lowest was between Alpha and Predicted (r = - 0.03). Shotgun metagenomics datasets showed a greater number of genera than Amplicon. Propionibacterium, Lactobacillus, and Prevotella were the most representative genera in Amplicon sequencing. In Shotgun metagenomics, the most representative genera were Escherichia, Chitinophaga, and Acinetobacter.
conclusionsCore of the salivary microbiome and genera diversity are dependent on the sequencing approaches. Available data suggest that Shotgun metagenomics and Amplicon sequencing have similar sensitivities to detect the taxonomic level investigated, although Shotgun metagenomics allows a deeper analysis of the microorganism diversity. Microbiome studies must consider characteristics and limitations of the sequencing approaches. Were identified 20 genera in the core of saliva microbiome, regardless of the health condition of the host. Some bacteria of the core need further study to better understand their role in the oral cavity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.