ArticleBMC public health2021
Acceptability, feasibility, and likelihood of stakeholders implementing the novel BPaL regimen to treat extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis patients.
Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of shorter multidrug-resistant or rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis regimens: a network meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Pooled it
- Comparative whole genome analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolated from BPaLM and individualized regimen treated patients at Dr. Soetomo Hospital, Indonesia.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Community-led monitoring of TB services in the Kyrgyz Republic.IJTLD open · 2026Article
- Orchestrating faster access to products of non-profit R&D: a case study of a novel regimen for drug-resistant tuberculosis.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Pakistan's path forward in DR-TB management: insights from global implementation of BPaL/BPaLM regimen.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Article
- Progress in programmatic management of drug-resistant TB, WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region, 2018-2023.IJTLD open · 2024Article
- The Efficacy and Safety of Bedaquiline in the Treatment of Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Analysis of Dynamic Efficacy Endpoints of the Nix-TB Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023Article
- Bedaquiline resistance probability to guide treatment decision making for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: insights from a qualitative study.BMC infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Can Pan-TB shorter regimens be a promising hope for ending TB in India by 2025 in ongoing COVID-19 era?The Indian journal of tuberculosis · 2022Article
- Pretomanid for tuberculosis treatment: an update for clinical purposes.Current research in pharmacology and drug discovery · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBPaL, a 6 month oral regimen composed of bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid for treating extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) is a potential alternative for at least 20 months of individualized treatment regimens (ITR). The ITR has low tolerability, treatment adherence, and success rates, and hence to limit patient burden, loss to follow-up and the emergence of resistance it is essential to implement new DR-TB regimens. The objective of this study was to assess the acceptability, feasibility, and likelihood of implementing BPaL in Indonesia, Kyrgyzstan, and Nigeria.
methodsWe conducted a concurrent mixed-methods study among a cross-section of health care workers, programmatic and laboratory stakeholders between May 2018 and May 2019. We conducted semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions to assess perceptions on acceptability and feasibility of implementing BPaL. We determined the proportions of a recoded 3-point Likert scale (acceptable; neutral; unacceptable), as well as the overall likelihood of implementing BPaL (likely; neutral; unlikely) that participants graded per regimen, pre-defined aspect and country. We analysed the qualitative results using a deductive framework analysis.
resultsIn total 188 stakeholders participated in this study: 63 from Kyrgyzstan, 51 from Indonesia, and 74 from Nigeria The majority were health care workers (110). Overall, 88% (146/166) of the stakeholders would likely implement BPaL once available. Overall acceptability for BPaL was high, especially patient friendliness was often rated as acceptable (93%, 124/133). In contrast, patient friendliness of the ITR was rated as acceptable by 45%. Stakeholders appreciated that BPaL would reduce workload and financial burden on the health care system. However, several stakeholders expressed concerns regarding BPaL safety (monitoring), long-term efficacy, and national regulatory requirements regarding introduction of the regimen. Stakeholders stressed the importance of addressing current health systems constraints as well, especially in treatment and safety monitoring systems.
conclusionsAcceptability and feasibility of the BPaL regimen is high among TB stakeholders in Indonesia, Kyrgyzstan, and Nigeria. The majority is willing to start using BPaL as the standard of care for eligible patients despite country-specific health system constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.