Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34271878›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2021

Delivery of acetamiprid to tea leaves enabled by porous silica nanoparticles: efficiency, distribution and metabolism of acetamiprid in tea plants.

Xinyi Wang, Min Yan, Jie Zhou, Wei Song, Yu Xiao, Chuanjian Cui, Wanjun Gao, Fei Ke, Jing Zhu, Zi Gu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Use of hydroponics-based evaluation for phenotyping tolerance/susceptibility to the aphid,Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Xinyi Wang *State Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, School of Tea and Food Science & Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Min Yan *State Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, School of Tea and Food Science & Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Jie ZhouSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Wei SongHefei Customs District Technical Center, Safety, Anhui Key Lab of Analysis and Detection for Food, Hefei, 230022, China.
Yu XiaoHefei Customs District Technical Center, Safety, Anhui Key Lab of Analysis and Detection for Food, Hefei, 230022, China.
Chuanjian CuiState Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, School of Tea and Food Science & Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Wanjun GaoState Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, School of Tea and Food Science & Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Fei KeState Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, School of Tea and Food Science & Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Jing ZhuState Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, School of Tea and Food Science & Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China.
Zi GuSchool of Chemical Engineering, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052 NSW, Australia.
Ruyan HouState Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, School of Tea and Food Science & Technology, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, 230036, China. hry@ahau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4423-694X
Anhui Agricultural University · CNHefei University · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPesticide residue and its poor utilization remains problematic in agricultural development. To address the issue, a nano-pesticide has been developed by incorporating pesticide acetamiprid in porous silica nanoparticles.

resultsThis nano-pesticide had an acetamiprid loading content of 354.01 mg g

conclusionsThis work demonstrated that our nano-pesticide outperformed the conventional pesticide acetamiprid in terms of insecticidal activity and pesticide residue, and the absorption, transportation and metabolism of nano-pesticide in tea plant were different, which pave a new pathway for pest control in agricultural sector.

Indexed as

InsecticidesNanoparticlesNeonicotinoidsCamellia sinensisPesticide ResiduesPlant LeavesacetamipridInsecticidesNeonicotinoidsPesticide ResiduesAcetamipridBiological activityDistribution and metabolismPorous silica nanoparticlesTea plant

Identifiers

PMID34271878
PMCPMC8283891
OpenAlexW3182312930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.