Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34271364›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology2021

Association of ABO and Rh blood groups with obstetric outcomes in SARS-CoV-2 infected pregnancies: A prospective study with a multivariate analysis.

José Antonio Sainz Bueno, Lucas Cerrillos González, Alejandra Abascal-Saiz, María Victoria Rodríguez Gallego, Rocío López Pérez, Ana María Fernández Alonso, Maria Luisa de la Cruz Conty, Rubén Alonso Saiz, Magdalena Molina Oller, Amparo Santamaría Ortiz and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Coronavirus Disease-2019 in Pregnancy.Clinics in chest medicine · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

José Antonio Sainz BuenoGynaecology and Obstetrics Department, G. Chacon (Viamed Santa Angela de la Cruz Hospital), Sevilla, Andalucía, Spain; Valme University Hospital and University of Seville, Spain. Electronic address: jsainz@us.es.
Lucas Cerrillos GonzálezGynaecology and Obstetrics Department, Virgen del Rocío Hospital, Sevilla, Andalucía, Spain. Electronic address: lcerrillog@sego.es.
Alejandra Abascal-SaizGynaecology and Obstetrics Department, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
María Victoria Rodríguez GallegoGynaecology and Obstetrics Department, San Millán-San Pedro Hospital, Logroño, La Rioja, Spain.
Rocío López PérezGynaecology and Obstetrics Department, Santa Lucía Hospital, Cartagena, Murcia, Spain.
Ana María Fernández AlonsoGynaecology and Obstetrics Department, Torrecárdenas Hospital, Almería, Andalucía, Spain.
Maria Luisa de la Cruz ContyFundación de Investigación Biomédica, Puerta de Hierro University Hospital of Majadahonda. Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Rubén Alonso SaizGynaecolgy and Obstetrics Department, Burgos Hospital, Burgos, Castilla y León, Spain.
Magdalena Molina OllerGynaecology and Obstetrics Department, Rafael Méndez Hospital, Lorca, Murcia, Spain. Electronic address: mariam.molina@carm.es.
Amparo Santamaría OrtizChair Hematology Department, Vinalopó Hospital, Alicante, Comunidad Valenciana, Spain. Electronic address: masantamaria@vinaloposalud.com.
Óscar Martínez-PérezObstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Puerta de Hierro University Hospital of Majadahonda. Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain; Autónoma University of Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: oscarmartinezgine@gmail.com.
Spanish Obstetric Emergency Group
Complejo Hospitalario Torrecárdenas · ESHospital Rafael Méndez · ESHospital San Pedro · ESHospital Universitario del Vinalopó · ESHospital Universitario de Valme · ESHospital Universitario La Paz · ESHospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda · ESHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío · ESSanta Lucía University General Hospital · ESUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the influence of ABO and Rh blood groups on morbidity among SARS-CoV-2 infected pregnancies.

designProspective observational study.

setting78 centers of the Spanish Obstetric Emergency Group. POPULATION: Pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 tested with polymerase-chain-reaction between 26-February and 5-November 2020. A cohort of 1278 SARS-CoV-2(+) pregnant women was analyzed and a concurrent comparison group of 1453 SARS-COV-2(-) patients was established.

methodsData were collected from medical charts. SARS-COV-2(+) was compared with SARS-COV-2(-) for differences in distribution of blood groups. We performed multivariate analysis, controlling for maternal age and ethnicity, to evaluate association of ABO and Rh blood groups with maternal and perinatal outcomes in SARS-CoV-2(+) patients with adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Medical morbidity: Symptomatic COVID-19 and medical complications. Obstetric outcomes: caesarean delivery, preterm deliveries, preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), hemorrhagic events, pre-eclampsia, maternal and neonatal mortality, stillbirth.

resultsDifferences were noted between blood types and Rh for age and ethnicity comparing SARS-CoV-2(+) and SARS-CoV-2(-) groups (p < 0.05). Among the SARS-CoV-2(+) cohort, the odds of symptomatic COVID-19 and obstetric hemorrhagic event were higher in Rh+ vs Rh- mothers (aOR 1.48, 95% CI 1.02-2.14, p = 0.037, and aOR 8.72, 95% CI 1.20-63.57, p = 0.033, respectively), and PPROM were higher among blood type A vs non-A mothers (aOR 2.06, 95% CI 1.01-4.18, p = 0.046).

conclusionsIn SARS-CoV-2(+) pregnant women, Rh- status was associated with a lower risk of symptomatic COVID-19, while Rh+ and blood group A were associated with obstetric hemorrhage and PPROM, respectively.

Indexed as

Blood Group AntigensCOVID-19Pregnancy Complications, InfectiousPremature BirthFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalMultivariate AnalysisPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2StillbirthBlood Group AntigensABO blood groupCoronavirusCOVID-19Disease susceptibilityMaternal morbidityPregnancySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34271364
PMCPMC8260552
OpenAlexW3178691893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.