Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34271309›Full record

ReviewESMO open2021

Clinical implications of isolated troponinemia following immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

D Delombaerde, D Vervloet, C Franssen, L Croes, F Gremonprez, H Prenen, M Peeters, C Vulsteke

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ESMO open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The role of prehabilitation in HNSCC patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

D DelombaerdeIntegrated Cancer Center Ghent, Department of Medical Oncology, AZ Maria Middelares, Ghent, Belgium; Center for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium. Electronic address: Danielle.Delombaerde@azmmsj.be.
D VervloetDepartment of Cardiology, AZ Maria Middelares, Ghent, Belgium.
C FranssenDepartment of Cardiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
L CroesIntegrated Cancer Center Ghent, Department of Medical Oncology, AZ Maria Middelares, Ghent, Belgium; Center for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
F GremonprezIntegrated Cancer Center Ghent, Department of Medical Oncology, AZ Maria Middelares, Ghent, Belgium.
H PrenenCenter for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium; Multidisciplinary Oncologic Center Antwerp (MOCA), Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
M PeetersCenter for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium; Multidisciplinary Oncologic Center Antwerp (MOCA), Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
C VulstekeIntegrated Cancer Center Ghent, Department of Medical Oncology, AZ Maria Middelares, Ghent, Belgium; Center for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
AZ Maria Middelares · BEUniversity of Antwerp · BEAntwerp University Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular adverse events induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have gained significant interest over the past decade due to their impact on short- and long-term outcomes. They were initially thought to be rare, but the increasing use of ICIs in the treatment of both advanced and early stages of various malignancies has resulted in a substantial increase in their incidence. Different guidelines have proposed screening measures for ICI-induced myocarditis by incorporating troponin measurements at baseline and during the first few weeks of treatment. However, no specific guidelines have been developed yet regarding the interpretation of an asymptomatic rise in troponins. This state-of-the art review aims to provide an overview of the clinical relevance of elevated troponins during checkpoint inhibition and recommendations on how to manage elevated troponin levels during ICI therapy.

Indexed as

MyocarditisNeoplasmsCardiotoxicityHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsTroponinImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsTroponinbiomarkercancercardiac troponincardiotoxicityimmunotherapymyocarditis

Identifiers

PMID34271309
PMCPMC8287144
OpenAlexW3181390286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.