Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34271305›Full record

ArticleVeterinary microbiology2021

First detection and molecular analysis of SARS-CoV-2 from a naturally infected cat from Argentina.

Nadia Analía Fuentealba, Gastón Moré, María Emilia Bravi, Juan Manuel Unzaga, Lorena De Felice, Marcos Salina, Mariana Viegas, Mercedes Soledad Nabaes Jodar, Laura Elena Valinotto, Fernando David Rivero and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. SARS-CoV-2 evolution in animals suggests mechanisms for rapid variant selection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nadia Analía FuentealbaLaboratorio de Virología, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias (FCV), Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP), 60 & 118, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina.
Gastón MoréLaboratorio de Inmunoparasitología, FCV-UNLP, 60 & 118, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina.
María Emilia BraviLaboratorio de Virología, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias (FCV), Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP), 60 & 118, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina.
Juan Manuel UnzagaLaboratorio de Inmunoparasitología, FCV-UNLP, 60 & 118, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Lorena De FeliceLaboratorio de Inmunoparasitología, FCV-UNLP, 60 & 118, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Marcos SalinaLaboratorio de Virología, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias (FCV), Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP), 60 & 118, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Mariana ViegasConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina; Laboratorio de Virología, Hospital de Niños Ricardo Gutiérrez, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Mercedes Soledad Nabaes JodarConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina; Laboratorio de Virología, Hospital de Niños Ricardo Gutiérrez, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Laura Elena ValinottoConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina; Centro de investigaciones en Genodermatosis y Epidermólisis Ampollar (CIDEGEA), Hospital de Niños Dr. Ricardo Gutiérrez / Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Fernando David RiveroInstituto Multidisciplinario de Salud, Tecnología y Desarrollo (IMSaTeD), CONICET-UNSE, Santiago del Estero, Argentina.
David Di LulloInstituto Multidisciplinario de Salud, Tecnología y Desarrollo (IMSaTeD), CONICET-UNSE, Santiago del Estero, Argentina.
Marcelo PecoraroLaboratorio de Virología, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias (FCV), Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP), 60 & 118, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Carlos Javier PaneiLaboratorio de Virología, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias (FCV), Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP), 60 & 118, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina. Electronic address: javierpanei@fcv.unlp.edu.ar.
Centro Científico Tecnológico - San Juan · ARUniversidad Nacional de La Plata · ARConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARUniversidad de Buenos Aires · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the etiological agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has rapidly spread worldwide. Studies of transmission of the virus carried out in animals have suggested that certain animals may be susceptible to infection with SARS-CoV-2. The aim of the present study was to investigate the infection of SARS-CoV-2 in pets (18 cats and 20 dogs) from owners previously confirmed as COVID-19-positive. Oropharyngeal and rectal swabs were taken and analyzed by real-time RT-PCR assays, while blood samples were taken for antibody detection. Of the total pets analyzed, one cat was found reactive to SARS-CoV-2 by real-time RT-PCR of an oropharyngeal and a rectal swab. This cat presented only sneezing as a clinical sign. Serological analysis confirmed the presence of antibodies in the serum sample from this cat, as well as in the serum from another cat non-reactive to real-time RT-PCR. Complete sequence and phylogenetic analysis allowed determining that the SARS-CoV-2 genome belonged to the B.1.499 lineage. This lineage has been reported in different provinces of Argentina, mainly in the Metropolitan Area of Buenos Aires. This study notifies the first detection of the natural infection and molecular analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in a cat from Argentina whose owner where COVID-19-positive. Although there is currently no evidence that cats can spread COVID-19, results suggest that health authorities should test pets with COVID-19-positive owners.

Indexed as

AnimalsArgentinaCat DiseasesCatsCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19 Nucleic Acid TestingDNA, ComplementaryDogsFemaleGenome, ViralHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPhylogenyRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2DNA, ComplementaryRNA, ViralCatsCoronavirusCOVID-19PetsSARS-CoV-2Transmission

Identifiers

PMID34271305
PMCPMC8265177
OpenAlexW3182520377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.