Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34270863›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2022

Haploid, diploid, and pooled exome capture recapitulate features of biology and paralogy in two non-model tree species.

Brandon M Lind, Mengmeng Lu, Dragana Obreht Vidakovic, Pooja Singh, Tom R Booker, Sally N Aitken, Sam Yeaman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brandon M LindDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Centre for Forest Conservation Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8560-5417
Mengmeng LuDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5023-3759
Dragana Obreht VidakovicDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Centre for Forest Conservation Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1529-3347
Pooja SinghDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6576-400X
Tom R BookerDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Centre for Forest Conservation Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8403-6219
Sally N AitkenDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Centre for Forest Conservation Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2228-3625
Sam YeamanDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1706-8699
University of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

Alberta Innovates Bio SolutionsCanadian Forest ServiceGenome Canada 241REF; Genome British Columbia; Genome Alberta; Génome Québec; British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural ResourcesSwiss Federal Research InstituteTimberWestUnites States Forestry ServiceUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of British Columbia, Faculty of Forestry Universite Laval; Compute Canada; Mosaic Forest ManagementUniversity of CalgaryVernon Seed Orchard Company; Forest Genetics Council of British ColumbiaWestern Forest Products; University of Toronto
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite their suitability for studying evolution, many conifer species have large and repetitive giga-genomes (16-31 Gbp) that create hurdles to producing high coverage SNP data sets that capture diversity from across the entirety of the genome. Due in part to multiple ancient whole genome duplication events, gene family expansion and subsequent evolution within Pinaceae, false diversity from the misalignment of paralog copies creates further challenges in accurately and reproducibly inferring evolutionary history from sequence data. Here, we leverage the cost-saving benefits of pool-seq and exome-capture to discover SNPs in two conifer species, Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii (Mirb.) Franco, Pinaceae) and jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb., Pinaceae). We show, using minimal baseline filtering, that allele frequencies estimated from pooled individuals show a strong, positive correlation with those estimated by sequencing the same population as individuals (r > .948), on par with such comparisons made in model organisms. Further, we highlight the utility of haploid megagametophyte tissue for identifying sites that are probably due to misaligned paralogs. Together with additional minor filtering, we show that it is possible to remove many of the loci with large frequency estimate discrepancies between individual and pooled sequencing approaches, improving the correlation further (r > .973). Our work addresses bioinformatic challenges in non-model organisms with large and complex genomes, highlights the use of megagametophyte tissue for the identification of paralogous artefacts, and suggests the combination of pool-seq and exome capture to be robust for further evolutionary hypothesis testing in these systems.

Indexed as

DiploidyTreesAnimalsBiologyExomeHaploidyHumansSheepexome-capturenon-modelparalogyPinaceaepool-seq

Identifiers

PMID34270863
PMCPMC9292622
OpenAlexW3179680415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.