Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34270755›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgery2021

Poor Fusion Rates Following Cervical Corpectomy Reconstructed With an Expandable Cage: Minimum 2-Year Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes.

Vadim A Byvaltsev, Andrei A Kalinin, Marat A Aliyev, Nurzhan O Azhibekov, Valerii V Shepelev, K Daniel Riew

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Clinical and radiological outcomes of one-level cervical corpectomy with an expandable cage for three-column uncomplicated subaxial type «B» injures: a multicenter retrospective study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vadim A ByvaltsevDepartment of Neurosurgery, Irkutsk State Medical University, Irkutsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4349-7101
Andrei A KalininDepartment of Neurosurgery, Irkutsk State Medical University, Irkutsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9039-9147
Marat A AliyevAsfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-7676-1127
Nurzhan O AzhibekovAsfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-4902-3874
Valerii V ShepelevDepartment of Neurosurgery, Irkutsk State Medical University, Irkutsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5135-8115
K Daniel RiewDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2083-9375

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExpandable cages are often used to reconstruct cervical corpectomies but there are few long-term follow-up studies with large numbers.

objectiveTo analyze the clinical and radiographic results of cervical corpectomy reconstructed with expandable cages for degenerative stenosis.

methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of 78 patients with degenerative cervical stenosis treated with a corpectomy reconstructed with an expandable cage. We evaluated the clinical and radiographic outcomes, as well as complications of the procedure at a minimum 2-yr follow-up.

resultsThere was a decrease in the visual analog scale pain average from 75 mm to 8.5 mm (P = .02); a decrease in the Neck Disability Index average from 55% to 12% (P = .009); and improvement in the Japanese Orthopaedic Association average from 12 to 14 points (P = .01). There was a change in cervical lordosis (Cobb method) average from -9.3° to -15.1° (P = .002), without significant loss of lordosis (P = .63). The fusion rate, by criteria of the Cervical Spine Research Society (CSRS), was low: using dynamic X-rays - 50% (n = 39/78) and using computed tomography (CT) - 47.4% (n = 37/78). A total of 11 patients (14.1%) suffered complications.

conclusionTo our knowledge, this is the largest series (78) with a minimum 2-yr follow-up in the literature and the first using the dynamic radiographic and CT criteria endorsed by the CSRS. Using these criteria, our fusion rates were much lower than all previous reports in the literature. Despite this, patient-reported outcomes were reasonable. There was a relatively low incidence of perioperative complications, most of which were likely not implant-specific and there was only 1 case of implant failure.

Indexed as

LordosisSpinal FusionAnimalsCervical VertebraeHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCervical spineCorpectomySpinal canal stenosisTelescopic prosthesesTransbody fusionVentral decompression

Identifiers

PMID34270755
PMCPMC8440060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.