Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34270734›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2021

Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals and Risk of Testicular Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Elvira V Bräuner, Youn-Hee Lim, Trine Koch, Cecilie S Uldbjerg, Laura S Gregersen, Marc K Pedersen, Hanne Frederiksen, Jørgen H Petersen, Brent A Coull, Anna-Maria Andersson and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Elvira V BräunerDepartment of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9183-4796
Youn-Hee LimSection of Environmental Health, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Trine KochDepartment of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0424-7268
Cecilie S UldbjergDepartment of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Laura S GregersenDepartment of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marc K PedersenDepartment of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hanne FrederiksenDepartment of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3180-9879
Jørgen H PetersenDepartment of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Brent A CoullDepartment of Biostatistics, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, USA.
Anna-Maria AnderssonDepartment of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Martha HickeyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3941-082X
Niels E SkakkebækDepartment of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Russ HauserDepartment of Environmental Health, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, USA.
Anders JuulDepartment of Growth and Reproduction, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0534-4350
University of Copenhagen · DKHarvard University · USCopenhagen University Hospital · DKThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

Prenatal Exposure to Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals and Risk of Testicular Cancer (DISRUPT)R01CA236816 · NCI · REGION HOVEDSTADEN · PI JUUL, ANDERS · 2020 to 2022
$863k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA236816NIH HHS 1R01CA236816-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of many hormone-dependent diseases, including testicular cancer, has sharply increased in all high-income countries during the 20th century. This is not fully explained by established risk factors. Concurrent, increasing exposure to antiandrogenic environmental endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) in fetal life may partially explain this trend. This systematic review assessed available evidence regarding the association between environmental EDC exposure and risk of testicular cancer (seminomas and nonseminomas). Following PRISMA guidelines, a search of English peer-reviewed literature published prior to December 14, 2020 in the databases PubMed and Embase® was performed. Among the 279 identified records, 19 were eligible for quality assessment and 10 for further meta-analysis. The completeness of reporting was high across papers, but over 50% were considered subject to potential risk of bias. Mean age at diagnosis was 31.9 years. None considered effects of EDC multipollutant mixtures. The meta-analyses showed that maternal exposure to combined EDCs was associated with a higher risk of testicular cancer in male offspring [summary risk ratios: 2.16, (95% CI:1.78-2.62), 1.93 (95% CI:1.49-2.48), and 2.78 (95% CI:2.27-3.41) for all, seminoma, and nonseminoma, respectively]. Similarly, high maternal exposures to grouped organochlorines and organohalogens were associated with higher risk of seminoma and nonseminoma in the offspring. Summary estimates related to postnatal adult male EDC exposures were inconsistent. Maternal, but not postnatal adult male, EDC exposures were consistently associated with a higher risk of testicular cancer, particularly risk of nonseminomas. However, the quality of studies was mixed, and considering the fields complexity, more prospective studies of prenatal EDC multipollutant mixture exposures and testicular cancer are needed.

Indexed as

Endocrine DisruptorsEnvironmental ExposureHumansMalePrognosisRisk FactorsTesticular NeoplasmsEndocrine Disruptorsendocrine disruptionmeta-analysissystematic reviewtesticular cancerxenobiotic chemicals

Identifiers

PMID34270734
PMCPMC8864757
OpenAlexW3179224399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.