ArticleInteractive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2021
Minimal invasive temporary percutaneous right ventricular circulatory support after left ventricular assist device implantation.
Article in Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gently handling the acutely failing right ventricle … at last!Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesCardiogenic shock is a life-threatening situation with high mortality rates. Mechanical unloading of the left ventricle may be achieved via left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Postoperative right ventricular (RV) failure, however, has very limited therapeutic options and is associated with increased postoperative mortality. In this paper, we describe a percutaneous right heart bypass for temporary postoperative RV support.
methodsWe retrospectively examined all patients receiving percutaneous RV mechanical support after LVAD implantation. All patients receiving trans-jugular mechanical right heart bypass during or after LVAD implantation in our tertiary medical centre between November 2014 and December 2019 were examined retrospectively. The venous draining cannula was placed in the femoral vein; the pulmonary cannula was placed in the pulmonary artery using fluoroscopy.
resultsIn total, 14 patients received RV support using the trans-jugular technique. Mean age was 48.4 ± 14.9 years. Nine patients were treated with mechanical circulatory support before LVAD implantation. Biventricular support was done in 7 patients. All patients were treated with an Heartware HVAD . Mean postoperative intensive care unit stay was 46.3 ± 32.4 days. Mean right heart bypass support time was 10.6 ± 4.3 days. Twelve patients (86%) could be bridged to RV recovery, RV assist device implantation or heart transplantation.
conclusionsPercutaneous RV mechanical support is feasible, safe and shows acceptable outcome. Early implantation of RV support may contribute to successful outcome after LVAD implantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.