Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34270686›Full record

ArticleAnesthesiology2021

Excitation of Putative Glutamatergic Neurons in the Rat Parabrachial Nucleus Region Reduces Delta Power during Dexmedetomidine but not Ketamine Anesthesia.

Eric D Melonakos, Morgan J Siegmann, Charles Rey, Christopher O'Brien, Ksenia K Nikolaeva, Ken Solt, Christa J Nehs

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The Serotonergic Dorsal Raphe Promotes Emergence from Propofol Anesthesia in Zebrafish.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Parabrachial nucleus activity in nociception and pain in awake mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Divergent Neural Activity in the VLPO During Anesthesia and Sleep.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eric D MelonakosFrom the Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; the Department of Anaesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-3643-9838
Morgan J SiegmannFrom the Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Charles ReyFrom the Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Christopher O'BrienFrom the Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ksenia K NikolaevaFrom the Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; the Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Ken SoltFrom the Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; the Department of Anaesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Christa J NehsFrom the Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; the Department of Anaesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
School of the Art Institute of Chicago · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Project 4: Mathematical Modeling Studies of Anesthetic ActionP01GM118269 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BROWN, EMERY N · 2017 to 2021
$9.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM118269
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParabrachial nucleus excitation reduces cortical delta oscillation (0.5 to 4 Hz) power and recovery time associated with anesthetics that enhance γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor action. The effects of parabrachial nucleus excitation on anesthetics with other molecular targets, such as dexmedetomidine and ketamine, remain unknown. The hypothesis was that parabrachial nucleus excitation would cause arousal during dexmedetomidine and ketamine anesthesia.

methodsDesigner Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs were used to excite calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase 2α-positive neurons in the parabrachial nucleus region of adult male rats without anesthesia (nine rats), with dexmedetomidine (low dose: 0.3 µg · kg-1 · min-1 for 45 min, eight rats; high dose: 4.5 µg · kg-1 · min-1 for 10 min, seven rats), or with ketamine (low dose: 2 mg · kg-1 · min-1 for 30 min, seven rats; high dose: 4 mg · kg-1 · min-1 for 15 min, eight rats). For control experiments (same rats and treatments), the Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs were not excited. The electroencephalogram and anesthesia recovery times were recorded and analyzed.

resultsParabrachial nucleus excitation reduced delta power in the prefrontal electroencephalogram with low-dose dexmedetomidine for the 150-min analyzed period, excepting two brief periods (peak median bootstrapped difference [clozapine-N-oxide - saline] during dexmedetomidine infusion = -6.06 [99% CI = -12.36 to -1.48] dB, P = 0.007). However, parabrachial nucleus excitation was less effective at reducing delta power with high-dose dexmedetomidine and low- and high-dose ketamine (peak median bootstrapped differences during high-dose [dexmedetomidine, ketamine] infusions = [-1.93, -0.87] dB, 99% CI = [-4.16 to -0.56, -1.62 to -0.18] dB, P = [0.006, 0.019]; low-dose ketamine had no statistically significant decreases during the infusion). Recovery time differences with parabrachial nucleus excitation were not statistically significant for dexmedetomidine (median difference for [low, high] dose = [1.63, 11.01] min, 95% CI = [-20.06 to 14.14, -20.84 to 23.67] min, P = [0.945, 0.297]) nor low-dose ketamine (median difference = 12.82 [95% CI: -3.20 to 39.58] min, P = 0.109) but were significantly longer for high-dose ketamine (median difference = 11.38 [95% CI: 1.81 to 24.67] min, P = 0.016).

conclusionsThese results suggest that the effectiveness of parabrachial nucleus excitation to change the neurophysiologic and behavioral effects of anesthesia depends on the anesthetic's molecular target. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE:

Indexed as

Glutamic AcidAnesthesiaAnesthetics, DissociativeAnimalsCalcium-Binding ProteinsDelta RhythmDexmedetomidineHypnotics and SedativesKetamineMaleNeuronsParabrachial NucleusRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyAnesthetics, DissociativeCalcium-Binding ProteinsCamk2n1 protein, ratDexmedetomidineGlutamic AcidHypnotics and SedativesKetamine

Identifiers

PMID34270686
PMCPMC8440361
OpenAlexW3182489728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.