Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34270624›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2021

The advantages of abdominal compression with shallow breathing during left-sided postmastectomy radiotherapy by Helical TomoTherapy.

Chalardchay Pratoomchart, Pitchayaponne Klunklin, Somsak Wanwilairat, Wannapha Nobnop, Kittikun Kittidachanan, Imjai Chitapanarux

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chalardchay PratoomchartDivision of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiangmai, Thailand.
Pitchayaponne KlunklinDivision of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiangmai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-4791-6940
Somsak WanwilairatDivision of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiangmai, Thailand.
Wannapha NobnopDivision of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiangmai, Thailand.
Kittikun KittidachananDivision of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiangmai, Thailand.
Imjai ChitapanaruxDivision of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiangmai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-8552-0149
Chiang Mai University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeft-sided post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) certainly precedes some radiation dose to the cardiopulmonary organs causing many side effects. To reduce the cardiopulmonary dose, we created a new option of the breathing adapted technique by using abdominal compression applied with a patient in deep inspiration phase utilizing shallow breathing. This study aimed to compare the use of abdominal compression with shallow breathing (ACSB) with the free breathing (FB) technique in the left-sided PMRT. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwenty left-sided breast cancer patients scheduled for PMRT were enrolled. CT simulation was performed with ACSB and FB technique in each patient. All treatment plans were created on a TomoTherapy planning station. The target volume and dose, cardiopulmonary organ volume and dose were analyzed. A linear correlation between cardiopulmonary organ volumes and doses were also tested.

resultsRegarding the target volumes and dose coverage, there were no significant differences between ACSB and FB technique. For organs at risk, using ACSB resulted in a significant decrease in mean (9.17 vs 9.81 Gy, p<0.0001) and maximum heart dose (43.79 vs 45.45 Gy, p = 0.0144) along with significant reductions in most of the evaluated volumetric parameters. LAD doses were also significantly reduced by ACSB with mean dose 19.24 vs 21.85 Gy (p = 0.0036) and the dose to 2% of the volume (D2%) 34.46 vs 37.33 Gy (p = 0.0174) for ACSB and FB technique, respectively. On the contrary, the lung dose metrics did not show any differences except the mean V5 of ipsilateral lung. The positive correlations were found between increasing the whole lung volume and mean heart dose (p = 0.05) as well as mean LAD dose (p = 0.041) reduction.

conclusionsThe ACSB technique significantly reduced the cardiac dose compared with the FB technique in left-sided PMRT treated by Helical TomoTherapy. Our technique is uncomplicated, well-tolerated, and can be applied in limited resource center.

Indexed as

Breath HoldingAdultAgedBreastBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHeartHumansLungMastectomyMiddle AgedOrgans at RiskRadiation InjuriesRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated

Identifiers

PMID34270624
PMCPMC8284651
OpenAlexW3125425432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.