Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34270606›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2021

Self-management for chronic widespread pain including fibromyalgia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Adam W A Geraghty, Emma Maund, David Newell, Miriam Santer, Hazel Everitt, Cathy Price, Tamar Pincus, Michael Moore, Paul Little, Rachel West and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. The effect of pelvic floor muscle-strengthening exercises on low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis on randomized clinical trials.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Adam W A GeraghtyPrimary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education [PPM], Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7984-8351
Emma MaundPrimary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education [PPM], Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
David NewellPrimary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education [PPM], Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Miriam SanterPrimary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education [PPM], Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7264-5260
Hazel EverittPrimary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education [PPM], Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Cathy PriceSolent NHS Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Tamar PincusDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Michael MoorePrimary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education [PPM], Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Paul LittlePrimary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education [PPM], Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Rachel WestPrimary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education [PPM], Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Beth StuartPrimary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education [PPM], Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
University of Southampton · GBHealth Sciences University · GBRoyal Holloway University of London · GBSolent NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic widespread pain (CWP) including fibromyalgia has a prevalence of up to 15% and is associated with substantial morbidity. Supporting psychosocial and behavioural self-management is increasingly important for CWP, as pharmacological interventions show limited benefit. We systematically reviewed the effectiveness of interventions applying self-management principles for CWP including fibromyalgia.

methodsMEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry were searched for studies reporting randomised controlled trials of interventions adhering to self-management principles for CWP including fibromyalgia. Primary outcomes included physical function and pain intensity. Where data were sufficient, meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model. Studies were narratively reviewed where meta-analysis could not be conducted Evidence quality was rated using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) (PROSPERO-CRD42018099212).

resultsThirty-nine completed studies were included. Despite some variability in studies narratively reviewed, in studies meta-analysed self-management interventions improved physical function in the short-term, post-treatment to 3 months (SMD 0.42, 95% CI 0.20, 0.64) and long-term, post 6 months (SMD 0.36, 95% CI 0.20, 0.53), compared to no treatment/usual care controls. Studies reporting on pain narratively had greater variability, however, those studies meta-analysed showed self-management interventions reduced pain in the short-term (SMD -0.49, 95% CI -0.70, -0.27) and long-term (SMD -0.38, 95% CI -0.58, -0.19) compared to no treatment/usual care. There were few differences in physical function and pain when self-management interventions were compared to active interventions. The quality of the evidence was rated as low.

conclusionReviewed studies suggest self-management interventions can be effective in improving physical function and reducing pain in the short and long-term for CWP including fibromyalgia. However, the quality of evidence was low. Future research should address quality issues whilst making greater use of theory and patient involvement to understand reported variability.

Indexed as

Chronic PainFibromyalgiaHumansPain ManagementSelf-Management

Identifiers

PMID34270606
PMCPMC8284796
OpenAlexW3179965898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.