Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34270578›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Models of provider care in long-term care: A rapid scoping review.

Candyce Hamel, Chantelle Garritty, Mona Hersi, Claire Butler, Leila Esmaeilisaraji, Danielle Rice, Sharon Straus, Becky Skidmore, Brian Hutton

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Models of Care and Relationships with Care Homes: Cross-Sectional Survey of English General Practices.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Candyce HamelKnowledge Synthesis Group, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5871-2137
Chantelle GarrittyKnowledge Synthesis Group, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Mona HersiKnowledge Synthesis Group, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Claire ButlerKnowledge Synthesis Group, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Leila EsmaeilisarajiKnowledge Synthesis Group, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Danielle RiceKnowledge Synthesis Group, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Sharon StrausDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto and St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Becky SkidmoreKnowledge Synthesis Group, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8293-9238
Brian HuttonKnowledge Synthesis Group, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOne of the current challenges in long-term care homes (LTCH) is to identify the optimal model of care, which may include specialty physicians, nursing staff, person support workers, among others. There is currently no consensus on the complement or scope of care delivered by these providers, nor is there a repository of studies that evaluate the various models of care. We conducted a rapid scoping review to identify and map what care provider models and interventions in LTCH have been evaluated to improve quality of life, quality of care, and health outcomes of residents.

methodsWe conducted this review over 10-weeks of English language, peer-reviewed studies published from 2010 onward. Search strategies for databases (e.g., MEDLINE) were run on July 9, 2020. Studies that evaluated models of provider care (e.g., direct patient care), or interventions delivered to facility, staff, and residents of LTCH were included. Study selection was performed independently, in duplicate. Mapping was performed by two reviewers, and data were extracted by one reviewer, with partial verification by a second reviewer.

resultsA total of 7,574 citations were screened based on the title/abstract, 836 were reviewed at full text, and 366 studies were included. Studies were classified according to two main categories: healthcare service delivery (n = 92) and implementation strategies (n = 274). The condition/ focus of the intervention was used to further classify the interventions into subcategories. The complex nature of the interventions may have led to a study being classified in more than one category/subcategory.

conclusionMany healthcare service interventions have been evaluated in the literature in the last decade. Well represented interventions (e.g., dementia care, exercise/mobility, optimal/appropriate medication) may present opportunities for future systematic reviews. Areas with less research (e.g., hearing care, vision care, foot care) have the potential to have an impact on balance, falls, subsequent acute care hospitalization.

Indexed as

Long-Term CareDelivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHumansNursing HomesQuality of Health CareQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID34270578
PMCPMC8284811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.