Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34270409›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2022

Impact of patient and family engagement in improving continuous positive airway pressure adherence in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial.

Nazia Naz S Khan, David Todem, Shireesha Bottu, M Safwan Badr, Adesuwa Olomu

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Maximizing outcomes by multimodal treatment in obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. A Pilot Trial Evaluating Collaborative Healthcare Encounters With Caregivers: A Checklist-Based Intervention for Primary Care.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2025
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The lived experience of positive airway pressure therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea across the lifespan: a qualitative study.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nazia Naz S KhanDepartment of Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
David TodemDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
Shireesha BottuDepartment of Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
M Safwan BadrDivision of Pulmonary Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Harper University Hospital, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.
Adesuwa OlomuDepartment of Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.

Funding

Does Treatment of Sleep-Disordered Breathing Improve Functional Outcomes in SCI?I01RX002116 · VA · JOHN D DINGELL VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BADR, M.SAFWAN · 2017 to 2020
–
RRD VA I01 RX002116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesThe aim of the Improving CPAP Adherence Program was to assess the impact of a multidimensional treatment framework based on shared decision-making, patient activation, and caregiver engagement on improving long-term positive airway pressure (PAP) adherence in patients newly diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea.

methodsIn this pilot study, patients aged ≥ 18 years with a new obstructive sleep apnea diagnosis who qualified for PAP treatment and lived with a caregiver were randomly assigned to receive either the multidimensional treatment (intervention, n = 28) or unrelated education (control group, n = 32). All patients and their caregiver participated in a group visit. The intervention group attended 4 structured sessions: interactive education, peer coaching, hands-on experience, and a semistructured motivational interview. The control group was educated on physical activity and lifestyle only. Objective PAP adherence data were obtained at baseline (day that they received PAP machine to group visit), group visit to 3 months, and 3-6 months.

resultsIn an age-adjusted model, the mean daily use of PAP increased significantly over the 3 time periods (

conclusionsA multifaceted patient-centered intervention with caregiver engagement improved PAP adherence vs control levels, a beneficial effect sustained for the 6 months. Our findings suggest that caregivers, with the appropriate training, can improve patients' PAP adherence by providing a socially supportive environment. CITATION: Khan NNS, Todem D, Bottu S, Badr MS, Olomu A. Impact of patient and family engagement in improving continuous positive airway pressure adherence in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial.

Indexed as

Motivational InterviewingSleep Apnea, ObstructiveAdolescentContinuous Positive Airway PressureHumansPatient CompliancePilot Projectsmotivational interviewmultifaceted interventionobstructive sleep apneapatient and caregiver engagementpeer coachingpositive airway pressure

Identifiers

PMID34270409
PMCPMC8807929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.