Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34270037›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021

Isolation of Staged and Viable Maize Microspores for DH Production.

Philippe Vergne, Antoine Gaillard

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Philippe VergneLaboratoire Reproduction et Développement des Plantes, Université de Lyon, ENS de Lyon, UCB Lyon 1, CNRS, INRAE, Lyon, France. philippe.vergne@ens-lyon.fr.
Antoine GaillardMAS Seeds, Haut-Mauco, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Isolated microspore culture systems have been designed in maize by several groups, mainly from the late 1980s to early 2000s. However, even with optimized protocols, microspore embryogenesis induction has remained very dependent on the genotype in maize, with elite germplasm generally displaying no response or very low response. Yet, these last few years, significant progress has been accomplished in understanding and controlling microspore embryogenesis induction in model dicot and monocot species. This knowledge may be transferred to maize, and isolated microspore culture may gain new interest in this crop, at least for embryogenesis research. The methods we hereby present in detail permit the purification of 3-12 × 10

Indexed as

Gametogenesis, PlantCulture MediaHaploidyPollenTissue Culture TechniquesZea maysCulture MediaAndrogenesisIsolated microsporesMaltoseMicrospore cultureMicrospore embryogenesisPercollSucroseZea mays L

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.