Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34270026›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021

Analysis of Ploidy in Haploids and Doubled Haploids.

Sergio J Ochatt, Jose M Seguí-Simarro

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sergio J OchattUMR 1347 Agroécologie, AgroSup/INRAE/uB, Laboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire, Morphogenèse et Validation (PCMV), Dijon, France. sergio.ochatt@inrae.fr.
Jose M Seguí-SimarroCell Biology Group - COMAV Institute, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determination of the ploidy level is an essential step when trying to produce doubled haploids (DHs) in any species. Each species and method used to produce DHs has its own frequency of DH production, which means that the rest of plants produced stay haploid. Since haploids are of little use for breeding purposes, it is necessary to distinguish them from true DHs. For this, several methodologies are available, including flow cytometry, chromosome counting, chloroplast counting in stomatal guard cells, measurement of stomatal size and length, counting of nucleoli, evaluation of pollen formation and viability, analysis of cell size, and analysis of morphological markers. However, not all of them are equally easy to use, affordable, reliable, reproducible, and resolutive and therefore useful for a particular case. In this chapter, we revise these methods available to assess the ploidy level of plants, discussing their respective advantages and limitations, and provide some troubleshooting tips and hints to help decide which to choose in each case.

Indexed as

Crosses, GeneticHaploidyPlant BreedingPloidiesSeedsZea maysChloroplast countingChromosome countingCytogeneticsFlow cytometry

Identifiers

PMID34270026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.