ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021
Use of Molecular Markers for Doubled Haploid Technology: From Academia to Plant Breeding Companies.
Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantifying Genetic Parameters for Blackleg Resistance in Rapeseed: A Comparative Study.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Population structure analysis to explore genetic diversity and geographical distribution characteristics of wild tea plant in Guizhou Plateau.BMC plant biology · 2023Article
- History, Phylogeny, Biodiversity, and New Computer-Based Tools for Efficient Micropropagation and Conservation of Pistachio (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular markers are employed for doubled haploid (DH) technology by researchers and applied plant breeders in many crops. In the 1990s, isozymes and RFLPs were commonly used marker technologies to characterize DHs and were later replaced by PCR- based markers (e.g., RAPDs, AFLPs, ISSRs, SSRs) and today by SNPs. Markers are used for multiple purposes in DH production, that is, for the study of genes underlying haploid induction and confirming homozygous plants of gametophytic origin. Furthermore, they are tools for investigating segregation in DH populations and for mapping simple and complex traits using DHs. The deployment of DHs and markers for developing trait-linked markers are demonstrated with examples from rapeseed, wheat, and barley. Marker development for resistance to viruses derived from genetic resources and their use in, for example, pyramiding of resistance genes, are given as an example for the combination of DH-technology and marker development in research. Today, marker systems amenable to automation are frequently used in applied plant breeding. Practical examples are given from Lantmännen (LM) ( https://Lantmannen.com ) using large-scale genotyping for variety development based on SSRs and SNPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.