Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34269975›Full record

ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2021

Bringing Mechanical Context to Image-Based Measurements of Bone Integrity.

Lindsay L Loundagin, Todd L Bredbenner, Karl J Jepsen, W Brent Edwards

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lindsay L LoundaginDepartment of Anatomy, Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Saskatchewan, 105 Administration Place, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A2, Canada.
Todd L BredbennerDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Colorado Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.
Karl J JepsenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
W Brent EdwardsHuman Performance Laboratory, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada. wbedward@ucalgary.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3623-9764

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewImage-based measurements of bone integrity are used to estimate failure properties and clinical fracture risk. This paper (1) reviews recent imaging studies that have enhanced our understanding of the mechanical pathways to bone fracture and (2) discusses the influence that inter-individual differences in image-based measurements may have on the clinical assessment of fracture risk RECENT

findingsIncreased tissue mineralization is associated with improved bone strength but reduced fracture toughness. Trabecular architecture that is important for fatigue resistance is less important for bone strength. The influence of porosity on bone failure properties is heavily dependent on pore location and size. The interaction of various characteristics, such as bone area and mineral content, can further complicate their influence on bone failure properties. What is beneficial for bone strength is not always beneficial for bone toughness or fatigue resistance. Additionally, given the large amount of imaging data that is clinically available, there is a need to develop effective translational strategies to better interpret non-invasive measurements of bone integrity.

Indexed as

Bone DensityAbsorptiometry, PhotonFractures, BoneHumansPorosityTomography, X-Ray ComputedBone fractureBone strengthComputed tomographyDual-energy X-ray absorptiometryOsteoporosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.