ArticleEcotoxicology (London, England)2021
Bacterial community variations in the South China Sea driven by different chemical conditions.
Article in Ecotoxicology (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, Illumina MiSeq sequencing of the 16 S rRNA gene was used to describe the bacterial communities in the South China Sea (SCS) during the southwest monsoon period. We targeted different regions in the SCS and showed that bacterial community was driven by the effects of the river, upwelling, and mesoscale eddy through changing the environmental factors (salinity, temperature, and nutrients). Distinct bacterial communities were observed among different chemical conditions, especially between the estuary and the open sea. The abundance of Burkholderiales, Frankiales, Flavobacteriales, and Rhodobacterales dominated the estuary and its adjacent waters. Bacteria in cyclonic eddy were dominated by Methylophilales and Pseudomonadales, whereas Prochlorococcus, SAR11 clade, and Oceanospirillales had relatively high abundance in the anticyclonic eddy. Overall, the abundance of specific phylotypes significantly varied among samples with different chemical conditions. Chemical conditions probably act as a driver that shapes and controls the diversity of bacteria in the SCS. This study suggests that the interaction between microbial and environmental conditions needs to be further considered to fully understand the diversity and function of marine microbes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.