Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34269881›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2021

A symptom-based approach in predicting ECT outcome in depressed patients employing MADRS single items.

Luisa Carstens, Corinna Hartling, Anna Stippl, Ann-Kathrin Domke, Ana Lucia Herrera-Mendelez, Sabine Aust, Matti Gärtner, Malek Bajbouj, Simone Grimm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Investigation of Neurofunctional Changes Over the Course of Electroconvulsive Therapy.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Luisa CarstensDepartment of Psychiatry, Centre for Affective Neuroscience (CAN), Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin, Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany. luisa.boenke@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3796-9400
Corinna HartlingDepartment of Psychiatry, Centre for Affective Neuroscience (CAN), Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin, Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Anna StipplDepartment of Psychiatry, Centre for Affective Neuroscience (CAN), Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin, Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Ann-Kathrin DomkeDepartment of Psychiatry, Centre for Affective Neuroscience (CAN), Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin, Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Ana Lucia Herrera-MendelezDepartment of Psychiatry, Centre for Affective Neuroscience (CAN), Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin, Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Sabine AustDepartment of Psychiatry, Centre for Affective Neuroscience (CAN), Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin, Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Matti GärtnerDepartment of Psychiatry, Centre for Affective Neuroscience (CAN), Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin, Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Malek BajboujDepartment of Psychiatry, Centre for Affective Neuroscience (CAN), Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin, Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Simone GrimmDepartment of Psychiatry, Centre for Affective Neuroscience (CAN), Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin, Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft BA3578/5-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft GR4510/5-1European Commission H2020- 634541
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Establishing symptom-based predictors of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) outcome seems promising, however, findings concerning the predictive value of distinct depressive symptoms or subtypes are limited; previous factor-analytic approaches based on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) remained inconclusive, as proposed factors varied across samples. In this naturalistic study, we refrained from these previous factor-analytic approaches and examined the predictive value of MADRS single items and their change during the course of ECT concerning ECT outcome. We used logistic and linear regression models to analyze MADRS data routinely assessed at three time points in 96 depressed psychiatric inpatients over the course of ECT. Mean age was 53 years (SD 14.79), gender ratio was 58:38 (F:M), baseline MADRS score was M = 30.20 (SD 5.42). MADRS single items were strong predictors of ECT response, remission and overall symptom reduction, especially items 1 (apparent sadness), 2 (reported sadness) and 8 (inability to feel), assessing affective symptoms. Strongest effects were found for regression models including item 2 (reported sadness) with up to 80% correct prediction of ECT outcome. ROC analyses were performed to estimate the optimal cut-point for treatment response. MADRS single items during the course of ECT might pose simple, reliable, time- and cost-effective predictors of ECT outcome. More severe affective symptoms of depression at baseline and a stronger reduction of these affective symptoms during the course of ECT seem to be positively associated with ECT outcome. Precise cut-off values for clinical use were proposed. Generally, these findings underline the benefits of a symptom-based approach in depression research and treatment in addition to depression sum-scores and generalized diagnoses.

Indexed as

DepressionElectroconvulsive TherapyAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesTreatment OutcomeDepressionElectroconvulsive therapy (ECT)Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)Response prediction

Identifiers

PMID34269881
PMCPMC8429160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.