ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2021
Computed Tomography Imaging of Aortic Dissections with Endovascular Treatment Considerations.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiologic reporting of DeBakey type I aortic dissection: key preoperative and postoperative findings of the AMDS hybrid stent.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- A case report: Acute presentation of chronic aortic dissection.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Imaging-Based Diagnosis of a Ruptured Isolated Dissecting Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Case Report.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- aCTA structured reporting of aortic dissection and updated knowledge required by radiologists.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Review
- Advancing Aortic Dissection Imaging: First Clinical Experience of Photon-Counting CT with Ultra-Fast Spectral Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Aortic regurgitation: A multimodality approach.Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewIn the present review, we discuss the role of CT imaging in the management of aortic dissection, with a particular emphasis on endovascular treatment considerations. RECENT
findingsComputed tomography imaging is a fundamental tool in the diagnosis and management of acute and chronic aortic dissection. Its diagnostic accuracy and high resolution contribute to and guide operative strategy. Persistent high mortality for patients who develop aortic dissections suggests a need for innovative diagnostic and treatment strategies. In the recent era, considerable advances have been made in computed tomography (CT) image acquisition, processing, and analysis as well as endovascular technologies with expanded roles in the treatment of aortic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34269860What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.