ReviewExperimental brain research2021
Age-related changes in motor cortex plasticity assessed with non-invasive brain stimulation: an update and new perspectives.
Review in Experimental brain research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Non-invasive brain stimulation combined with three rehabilitation approaches for cognitive and emotional well-being in Parkinson's patients.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Transcranial alternating current stimulation improves ballistic motor performance in trained and untrained limbs of healthy older adults.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Modulation of primary motor cortex after experimentally induced and use-dependent plasticity in young and older adults.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- Neuromodulation by repetitive paired-pulse TMS at late I-wave intervals in older adults.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- Repeated spaced paired-associative stimulation to the parietal-motor pathway maintains corticomotor excitability in older adults.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Motor learning and performance in schizophrenia and aging: two different patterns of decline.Experimental brain research · 2024Article
- Repetitive paired-pulse TMS increases motor cortex excitability and visuomotor skill acquisition in young and older adults.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Maternal stress-induced changes in adolescent and adult offspring: Neurobehavioural improvement and telomere maintenance.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Modulation of dorsal premotor cortex differentially influences I-wave excitability in primary motor cortex of young and older adults.The Journal of physiology · 2023Article
- Transcranial burst electrical stimulation contributes to neuromodulatory effects in the rat motor cortex.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is commonly accepted that the brains capacity to change, known as plasticity, declines into old age. Recent studies have used a variety of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques to examine this age-related decline in plasticity in the primary motor cortex (M1), but the effects seem inconsistent and difficult to unravel. The purpose of this review is to provide an update on studies that have used different NIBS techniques to assess M1 plasticity with advancing age and offer some new perspective on NIBS strategies to boost plasticity in the ageing brain. We find that early studies show clear differences in M1 plasticity between young and older adults, but many recent studies with motor training show no decline in use-dependent M1 plasticity with age. For NIBS-induced plasticity in M1, some protocols show more convincing differences with advancing age than others. Therefore, our view from the NIBS literature is that it should not be automatically assumed that M1 plasticity declines with age. Instead, the effects of age are likely to depend on how M1 plasticity is measured, and the characteristics of the elderly population tested. We also suggest that NIBS performed concurrently with motor training is likely to be most effective at producing improvements in M1 plasticity and motor skill learning in older adults. Proposed NIBS techniques for future studies include combining multiple NIBS protocols in a co-stimulation approach, or NIBS strategies to modulate intracortical inhibitory mechanisms, in an effort to more effectively boost M1 plasticity and improve motor skill learning in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34269850What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.